Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on June 9, 2004
Journal of Plankton Research 2004 26(9):1069-1081; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbh098
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/9/1069    most recent
fbh098v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calvo-Díaz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Varela, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Calvo-Díaz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Varela, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol. 26 No. 9 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Picoplankton community structure along the northern Iberian continental margin in late winter–early spring

Alejandra Calvo-Díaz, Xosé Anxelu G. Morán*, Enrique Nogueira, Antonio Bode1 and Manuel Varela1

Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO), Centro Oceanográfico de Xixón, Camín de L’Arbeyal, S/N, E-33212 Xixón, Spain and 1 Centro Oceanográfico de a Coruña, APDO. 130, E-15080 a Coruña, Spain

* Corresponding Author: xelu.moran{at}gi.ieo.es

Received January 26, 2004; accepted in principle April 8, 2004; accepted for publication May 26, 2004; published online June 9, 2004

The surface distribution of autotrophic and heterotrophic picoplankton was assessed in 24 transects perpendicular to the coast along the N and NW Iberian peninsula shelf in late winter and early spring 2002. Community structure was analyzed by flow cytometry (FC) and found to be strongly influenced by hydrography. Typical late winter conditions were found during the survey, characterized by the presence of the poleward Portugal coastal counter current (PCCC) in the west and an increasing stratification eastwards. Cyanobacteria (mostly Synechococcus) dominated at low chlorophyll a (Chl a) concentration whereas both the total and relative abundance of picoeukaryotes generally increased with total phytoplankton biomass. Differences in the cell size of most FC-defined picoplanktonic groups were also observed along the longitudinal and coastal–offshore gradients. The presence of Prochlorococcus (<103 cells mL–1) coincided with the core of the PCCC and its significant correlation with salinity suggests its possible use as a tracer of this current. Two groups of heterotrophic bacteria were distinguished according to their relative DNA content. High DNA bacteria dominated the community (60 ± 1% SE of total numbers), reaching maximum values in areas under riverine influence with presumed higher inputs of organic matter. Picoplankton biomass was dominated by heterotrophic bacteria in the western region (58 ± 3%) while autotrophic groups contributed on average 66 ± 2% in the southern Bay of Biscay. The heterotrophic bacteria to phytoplankton biomass ratio decreased significantly along the measured range. Yet showing regional differences, the estimated contribution of picophytoplankton to total algal biomass was high (mean 59 ± 4%), indicating the important role of small cells at the onset of the spring bloom in these temperate shelf waters.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
L. Zarauz, X. Irigoien, and J. A. Fernandes
Changes in plankton size structure and composition, during the generation of a phytoplankton bloom, in the central Cantabrian sea
J. Plankton Res., February 1, 2009; 31(2): 193 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.