JPR Advance Access originally published online on March 30, 2004
Journal of Plankton Research 2004 26(7):799-810; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbh067
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal of Plankton Research Vol. 26 No. 7 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved
Daphnia dominance and zooplankton community structure in fishless ponds
W. K. Kellogg Biological Station and the Department of Zoology, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI 49060, USA 1 Present Address: Department of Animal Biology, University of Illinois, 515 Morrill Hall, 505 South Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
* Corresponding Author: csteiner{at}life.uiuc.edu
Predation by fish has commonly been viewed as a primary driver of spatial and seasonal variation in Daphnia dominance and the size structure of zooplankton communities. Yet, previous research suggests that large Daphnia do not always dominate in the absence of predation. As alternatives to the planktivory model, numerous mechanisms have been put forth, including the effect of resource competition and its interaction with resource quantity and quality and abiotic factors (e.g. temperature). Here results are presented of a field survey of 18 fishless, permanent ponds in southwest Michigan in which spatiotemporal variation in Daphnia pulex abundance and several potential determinants of this variation are explored. Results revealed a large amount of variation in D. pulex incidence and relative biomass, with some ponds exhibiting seasonal losses, some having few or no Daphnia, and some being dominated by D. pulex for the entire sample period. Redundancy analysis of zooplankton composition and pond environmental variables (biotic and abiotic) showed no relationship between D. pulex biomass and measures of Chaoborus abundance, algal resource production, or algal resource quality (including seston C:N:P). Instead, pH and temperature (both of which covaried) showed the strongest relationship with D. pulex biomass.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Mitra and K. J. Flynn Predator-prey interactions: is 'ecological stoichiometry' sufficient when good food goes bad? J. Plankton Res., May 1, 2005; 27(5): 393 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
