Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on February 16, 2004
Journal of Plankton Research 2004 26(4):445-457; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbh042
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/4/445    most recent
fbh042v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koukaras, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nikolaidis, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Koukaras, K.
Right arrow Articles by Nikolaidis, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol. 26 No. 4 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Dinophysis blooms in Greek coastal waters (Thermaikos Gulf, NW Aegean Sea)

Konstantinos Koukaras and Georgios Nikolaidis*

Department of Botany, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Po Box 109, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece

* Corresponding Author: nikola{at}bio.auth.gr

The first documented Dinophysis bloom from Greek coastal waters associated with a diarrhetic shellfish toxins outbreak was recorded in January 2000 during the HAB monitoring program in Thermaikos Gulf. A species with morphological features similar to D. acuminata Claparède and Lachmann dominated this bloom. Maximum D. cf. acuminata abundance (85.4 x 103 cells L–1) appeared in February 2000. In 2001, high numbers of D. cf. acuminata (5 x 103 cells L–1) were recorded in April under conditions of weak thermal stratification, while in 2002 maximum numbers (37 x 103 cells L–1) of the same species were found in February under low temperature levels (11.5–12.5°C). All Dinophysis blooms persisted for no more than 4 months. In addition to cells resembling typical D. cf. acuminata, cells of similar shape but smaller in size were observed at different stages of the blooms. Other observations include couplets of large and small-sized cells, and also a larger robust form with a dense granular cytoplasm. The D. cf. acuminata population always presented a stratified vertical distribution with vertical peaks positioned in or just above the pycnocline. Among the physico-chemical parameters, water temperature appears to be the most important factor influencing the distribution of Dinophysis abundance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.