Skip Navigation


JPR Advance Access originally published online on July 1, 2004
Journal of Plankton Research 2004 26(11):1301-1313; doi:10.1093/plankt/fbh121
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
26/11/1301    most recent
fbh121v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isla, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Anadón, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Isla, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Anadón, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol. 26 No. 11 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Size-fractionated mesozooplankton biomass, metabolism and grazing along a 50°N–30°S transect of the Atlantic Ocean

José Alejandro Isla*, Marcos Llope and Ricardo Anadón

Departamento de Biología de Organismos y Sistemas (ÁREA ECOLOGÍA), Universidad de Oviedo, C/Catedrático Rodrigo Uría, S/N, 33071 Oviedo, Spain

* Corresponding Author: jisla.uo{at}uniovi.es

Received April 26, 2004; accepted in principle June 2, 2004; accepted for publication June 17, 2004; published online July 1, 2004

Size-fractionated mesozooplankton grazing and metabolism were investigated along the wide latitudinal range (50°N–30°S) covered during the Atlantic Meridional Transect (AMT) 11 cruise. Five different oceanic provinces were traversed in this cruise: North Atlantic Drift (NADR), North Atlantic Subtropical Gyral (NAST), Canary Coastal (CNRY), Eastern Tropical Atlantic (ETRA), and South Atlantic Gyral (SATL). CNRY and ETRA were affected by the upwelling Mauritanian and equatorial respectively and primary production in these provinces was higher than in the oligotrophic subtropical gyres (NAST and SATL). Both mesozooplankton and phytoplankton biomass were highest around the equator. The amount of chlorophyll a ingested daily by copepods was noticeably higher in mesotrophic than in oligotrophic provinces as shown by the spatial distribution of gut content values and the high abundances of copepods recorded at the equator. Grazing impact along the transect ranged from 0.2 to 5.6% of the phytoplankton standing stock and from 1.6 to 14.5% of primary production. If only phytoplankton >2 µm are considered, the ranges are 1.0–19.4% (stock) and 3.4–44.7% (primary production). Grazing impact upon both phytoplankton biomass and primary production followed a spatial distribution similar to that of chlorophyll a ingestion, with higher values in upwelling zones than in the gyres. Weight-specific rates of respiration and NH4+ and PO43– excretion showed large variability both along the transect and within provinces, but did not differ between provinces. Therefore, zooplankton assemblages inhabiting the different provinces visited in the AMT 11 seem to be adapted to the prevailing thermal conditions. Given the substantial proportion of nitrogen and phosphorus that are supplied to primary producers through the excretory activity of mesozooplankton (the percentage of nitrogen and phosphorus requirements of phytoplankton accounted for by mesozooplankton excretion was >30% in all the provinces) it follows that they may play a crucial role as nutrient regenerators, especially in the oligotrophic gyres where regenerated production dominates.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
S. Hernandez-Leon, C. Fraga, and T. Ikeda
A global estimation of mesozooplankton ammonium excretion in the open ocean
J. Plankton Res., May 1, 2008; 30(5): 577 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.