Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johansson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Larsson, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johansson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Larsson, U.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 26 | NUMBER 1 | PAGES 67-80 | 2004
© Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved

Annual variability in ciliate community structure, potential prey and predators in the open northern Baltic Sea proper

Mona Johansson*, Elena Gorokhova and Ulf Larsson

Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

* Corresponding Author: mojo{at}system.ecology.su.se

Biomass of ciliates, bacteria and mesozooplankton, as well as biomass estimates of phytoplankton from chlorophyll a values, were studied in the mixed layer of the northern Baltic Sea proper, between February and December 1998. Production of phytoplankton and bacteria was measured, and production of ciliates and mesozooplankton was estimated. The phytoplankton spring bloom in late March was dominated by diatoms and dinoflagellates. Ciliates had a biomass peak shortly after the spring bloom, while mesozooplankton peaked in July. Thus, the predation pressure on ciliates was low in spring, and ciliates were major predators, potentially consuming up to 15% of the primary production. In summer, there was a shift from larger to smaller ciliates coinciding with a shift from larger to smaller primary producers, an increase in bacterial production, and also an increase in mesozooplankton abundance, mainly copepods. Elevated mesozooplankton predation and selective removal of larger ciliate species and/or a shift to smaller prey size presumably caused these changes. The potential carbon consumption from ciliates and mesozooplankton was highest in summer and autumn, reaching 55 and 40% of the primary production in summer and autumn, respectively. Ciliates consumed twice as much as mesozooplankton, thus acting as important regenerators.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol Biol EvolHome page
S. B. Gould, W.-H. Tham, A. F. Cowman, G. I. McFadden, and R. F. Waller
Alveolins, a New Family of Cortical Proteins that Define the Protist Infrakingdom Alveolata
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2008; 25(6): 1219 - 1230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
K. Samuelsson, J. Berglund, and A. Andersson
Factors structuring the heterotrophic flagellate and ciliate community along a brackish water primary production gradient
J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2006; 28(4): 345 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
M. Modigh and S. Castaldo
Effects of fixatives on ciliates as related to cell size
J. Plankton Res., August 1, 2005; 27(8): 845 - 849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.