Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Turley, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Turley, C. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.25 no.9 pp.1011-1019, 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003

Low bacterial growth efficiency in the oligotrophic eastern Mediterranean Sea: a modelling analysis

Thomas R. Anderson* and Carol M. Turley1

Southampton Oceanography Centre, Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH and 1 Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, UK

* Corresponding Author: tra{at}soc.soton.ac.uk

Bacterial growth efficiency (BGE) is generally related to the trophic status of marine systems, with values as low as 0.15 or less associated with the most nutrient-depleted areas. A simple steady-state model is used to examine whether the observed ratio of bacterial to primary production (BP:PP) of 0.22 in the eastern Mediterranean Sea, an ultra-oligotrophic system, can be sustained given a BGE of <=0.15. There is no a priori reason to believe that BGE should be higher in this area relative to other open ocean environments, although accurate measurements are required to investigate this possibility. The model includes primary production [both particulate and exudation of dissolved material expressed as a percentage of extracellular release (PER)] and terriginous dissolved organic carbon (DOC) as sources, cycling via zooplankton, viruses and bacteria, and bacterial and zooplanktonrespiration as sinks for carbon. Results indicate that a BP:PP of 0.22 cannot be maintained if bacterial carbon demand is met solely with DOC of autochthonous origin, given a BGE of <=0.15. Sufficient carbon is, however, supplied to maintain this ratio if a high phytoplankton exudation of DOC (PER = 40%) is permitted, in conjunction with a BGE of 0.16. A BGE of 0.28 is required if PER takes on a more typical value of 10%. The possibility of BP being significantly enhanced by DOC of terrestrial origin is discounted, there being no major riverine sources near the Cretan Sea. Our analysis emphasizes the need for accurate estimates of BGE, and an improved understanding of sources and sinks of organic carbon, in marine systems.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.