Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castellani, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, I. A. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Castellani, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, I. A. N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.25 no.5 pp.527-537, 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003

Seasonal variation in egg morphology and hatching success in the calanoid copepods Temora longicornis, Acartia clausi and Centropages hamatus

C. Castellani1,* and I. A. N. Lucas

School of Ocean Sciences, Askew Street, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, LL57 5EY, UK

* Corresponding Author: cxc{at}soc.soton.ac.uk

1 Present Address: George Deacon Division, Southampton Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK

We report here on the seasonal changes in ultramicroscopic morphology of the eggs of the calanoid copepod Temora longicornis. During a field study between 1996 and 1998 in the Menai Strait, eastern Irish Sea, T. longicornis produced two types of eggs; hatching or subitaneous eggs were spawned during autumn–winter, whereas a high proportion of non-hatching eggs (up to ~8%) were found during spring–summer. Hatching and non-hatching eggs looked very similar under the light microscope, both being round in shape and with no apparent external ornamentation or spines. However, analysis under the scanning electron microscope showed clear differences in external morphology and in the thickness of the chorion of the two egg types. The surface of the subitaneous egg was smooth overall with circular pits and the egg chorion was thin (~1 µm). The surface of the non-hatching egg was ornamented with rough ridges and the chorion was thick (~5 µm). The diameter and the surface of the eggs spawned by T. longicornis were also different from those of Acartia clausi and Centropages hamatus, two calanoid species commonly found in the Menai Strait. It is concluded that the non-hatching eggs produced by T. longicornis are resting egg stages. The massive production of resting eggs by T. longicornis during peak reproduction may have profound implications for the population dynamics of this copepod species and the ecology of the area.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. A. Cohen, A. H. Knoll, and R. B. Kodner
Large spinose microfossils in Ediacaran rocks as resting stages of early animals
PNAS, April 21, 2009; 106(16): 6519 - 6524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
J.A. Lindley and S. Daykin
Variations in the distributions of Centropages chierchiae and Temora stylifera (Copepoda: Calanoida) in the north-eastern Atlantic Ocean and western European shelf waters
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(5): 869 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
M. Engel and H.-J. Hirche
Seasonal variability and inter-specific differences in hatching of calanoid copepod resting eggs from sediments of the German Bight (North Sea)
J. Plankton Res., September 1, 2004; 26(9): 1083 - 1093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.