Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Teegarden, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Durbin, E. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Teegarden, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Durbin, E. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.25 no.4 pp.429-443, 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003

Phycotoxin accumulation in zooplankton feeding on Alexandrium fundyense—vector or sink?

Gregory J. Teegarden*, Allan D. Cembella1, Carissa L. Capuano3, Stacy H. Barron3 and Edward G. Durbin2

Saint Joseph’s College, 278 Whites Bridge Road, Standish, Maine 04084, USA, 1 Institute for Marine Biosciences, National Research Council, 1411 Oxford St, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 2 Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882 and 3 Bowdoin College, Brunswick, Maine 04011, USA

* Corresponding Author: gteegarden{at}sjcme.edu

Zooplankton can consume toxic Alexandrium spp. dinoflagellates in the Gulf of Maine and retain paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) toxins, potentially acting as toxin vectors. We performed experiments to determine toxin budgets for common species of copepods (Acartia hudsonica, Eurytemora herdmani, Centropages hamatus) feeding on toxic Alexandrium fundyense, offered as monocultures or in mixtures of algal prey, by comparing calculated toxin ingestion rates and toxin content of copepod body tissue and fecal pellets. When fed monocultures, both copepod tissue and fecal pellet fractions accounted for <= 5% each of the calculated ingested toxin, and thus by difference >= 90% was lost as a dissolved fraction into the seawater medium. The presence of alternative food did not significantly alter the efficiency of toxin retention. Sloppy feeding or regurgitation are probable mechanisms for release of toxin to sea water. Experiments using varying concentrations of A. fundyense and alternativenon-toxic species did not show significant effects of cell concentration on toxin retention efficiency. Total toxin retained and efficiency of retention varied among copepod species. Toxin profiles (% molar composition) of dinoflagellates, copepod tissues and fecal pellets differed slightly, suggesting some metabolic transformation. Because of their low retention efficiency, copepod grazers can effectively disperse PSP toxins produced by Alexandrium spp. into the environment, where they are much less likely to be harmful—zooplankton act as a sink for PSP toxins. Nevertheless, sufficient toxin body burdens are attained to contribute to propagation of PSP toxins to other trophic levels.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.