Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ansotegui, A.
Right arrow Articles by Orive, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ansotegui, A.
Right arrow Articles by Orive, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.25 no.4 pp.341-355, 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003

Size distribution of algal pigments and phytoplankton assemblages in a coastal—estuarine environment: contribution of small eukaryotic algae

Arantza Ansotegui, Aitziber Sarobe, Juan María Trigueros, Iñaki Urrutxurtu and Emma Orive*

Laboratorio De Ecología, Facultad De Ciencias, Universidad Del País Vasco, ApdO. 644, 48080, Bilbao, Spain

* Corresponding Author: gvporage{at}lg.ehu.es

The size structure and the taxonomic composition of phytoplankton assemblages were assessed in the lower Urdaibai estuary from February 1998 to January 1999 by means of high-pressure liquid chromatography of algal pigments, along with microscopic observations of live and fixed cells. Four size classes were delineated: microplankton (>20 µm), large nanoplankton (8–20 µm), small nanoplankton (1–8 µm) and picoplankton (<1 µm). The dominant marker pigments in the samples were fucoxanthin, 19'-butanoyloxyfucoxanthin (19'but), chlorophyll (Chl) b, alloxanthin, peridinin and lutein–zeaxanthin. During the winter–spring transition, most of the Chl a was found in the microplankton size fraction. However, during the rest of the observation period, dominated by nanoplankton, a great proportion of the total Chl a (60–80%) appeared in the <8 µm fraction. The relative importance of the picophytoplankton was highest from April to November; its contribution during this period ranged from 10% to ~40% of the total Chl a. Observations using microscopy confirmed the dominance of diatoms during most of the year and the presence of prymnesiophytes, prasinophytes, chrysophytes, cryptophytes, dinoflagellates, euglenophytes and cyanobacteria. Based on signature pigments and microscopic observations, the following groups of algae were established: fucoxanthin-containing, 19'but-containing, chlorophytes, euglenophytes, dinoflagellates, cryptophytes and cyanobacteria, whose contribution to total Chl a is discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
M. Lefranc, A. Thenot, C. Lepere, and D. Debroas
Genetic Diversity of Small Eukaryotes in Lakes Differing by Their Trophic Status
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., October 1, 2005; 71(10): 5935 - 5942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
F. Not, M. Latasa, D. Marie, T. Cariou, D. Vaulot, and N. Simon
A Single Species, Micromonas pusilla (Prasinophyceae), Dominates the Eukaryotic Picoplankton in the Western English Channel
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 2004; 70(7): 4064 - 4072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.