Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kane, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kane, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.25 no.2 pp.151-167, 2003
© Oxford University Press 2003

Spatial and temporal abundance patterns for the late stage copepodites of Metridia lucens (Copepoda: Calanoida) in the US northeast continental shelf ecosystem

Joseph Kane

Noaa, National Marine Fisheries Service, 28 Tarzwell Drive, Narragansett, RI, USA

E-mail: jkane{at}whsun1.wh.whoi.edu

The annual cycle of abundance for the calanoid copepod Metridia lucens and its interannual variability are described from 17 611 samples collected on 193 broad-scale plankton surveys of the US northeast continental shelf region from 1977 to 1999. The copepod’s seasonal distribution is illustrated with bi-monthly geographic abundance plots. Abundance of M. lucens is compared with various environmental variables, abundance of the copepod Calanus finmarchicus, density of potential predators and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index. Metridia lucens abundance increased throughout the ecosystem during spring warming and usually reached peak levels in late spring. The highest mean densities were measured in the Gulf of Maine (GOM), where the copepod is usually found year round and exhibits a weak, decreasing west to east abundance gradient. The less dense populations located on Georges Bank and within the Middle Atlantic Bight are characterized by year-round onshore to offshore gradients that strengthen during the summer months when the copepod concentrates offshore where there is a cool layer of subthermocline water, the region often referred to as the cold pool. Interannual variability in abundance showed two persistent periods: above average values from 1979 to 1982, followed by very low levels from 1983 to at least 1987. Metridia lucens abundance in the 1990s has usually been at or above time series means. None of the environmental variables measured during the surveys could be correlated to this variability. The copepod’s abundance in the GOM was not related to variation in the NAO index or to changes in predator abundance found in the region. The seasonal abundance cycle and interannual variability of M. lucens in the GOM were found to be very similar to those found for the dominant copepod, Calanus finmarchicus. Reasons for this coupling are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
J. Kane and J. Prezioso
Distribution and multi-annual abundance trends of the copepod Temora longicornis in the US Northeast Shelf Ecosystem
J. Plankton Res., May 1, 2008; 30(5): 619 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
J. Kane
Zooplankton abundance trends on Georges Bank, 1977-2004
ICES J. Mar. Sci., July 1, 2007; 64(5): 909 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
J. Kane
The demography of Calanus finmarchicus (Copepoda: Calanoida) in the Middle Atlantic Bight, USA, 1977-2001
J. Plankton Res., May 1, 2005; 27(5): 401 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.