Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jochem, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jochem, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 25 | NUMBER 10 | PAGES 1201-1214 | 2003
© Oxford University Press

Photo- and heterotrophic pico- and nanoplankton in the Mississippi River plume: distribution and grazing activity

Frank J. Jochem1,*

The University of Texas At Austin, Marine Science Institute, 750 Channel View Drive, Port Aransas, TX 78373, USA 1 Present Address: Florida International University, Marine Biology Program, 3000 NE 151 Street, North Miami, FL 33181, USA

* Corresponding Author: frank{at}jochemnet.de

The abundance of pico- and nanophytoplankton, bacteria and heterotrophic nanoflagellates, and grazing rates on phototrophic pico- and nanoplankton and bacterioplankton were assessed along a salinity gradient (0.2–34.4) in the Mississippi River plume in May 2000. Grazing rates were established by serial dilution experiments, and analysis by flow cytometry allowed differentiation of grazing rates for different phytoplankton subpopulations (eukaryotes, Synechococcus spp., Prochlorococcus spp.). Grazing rates on phytoplankton tended to increase along the salinity gradient and often approached or exceeded 1 day-1. Phytoplankton net growth rates (growth – grazing) were mostly negative, except for positive values for eukaryotic nanoplankton in the low-salinity, high-chlorophyll region. Grazing pressure on bacteria was moderate (~0.5 day-1) and bacteria gained positive net growth rates of ~0.3 day-1. Eukaryotic nanophytoplankton were the major phototrophic biomass and protozoan food source, contributing 30–80% of the total consumed carbon. Bacteria were the second most important food source at 9–48% of the total consumed carbon. Synechococcus spp. and Prochlorococcus spp. remained an insignificant portion of protozoan carbon consumption, probably due to their low contribution to the total pico- and nanoplankton biomass. Group-specific grazing losses relative to standing stocks suggest protozoan prey preference for eukaryotes over bacteria. Protozoan grazers exerted a major grazing pressure on pico- and nanophytoplankton, but less so on bacteria.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
F. J. Jochem, M. J. McCarthy, and W. S. Gardner
Microbial ammonium cycling in the Mississippi River plume during the drought spring of 2000
J. Plankton Res., November 1, 2004; 26(11): 1265 - 1275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.