Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Froneman, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Froneman, P. W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.24 no.8 pp.807-816, 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002

Trophic cascading in an oligotrophic temperate estuary, South Africa

P. W. Froneman

Department Of Zoology And Entomology, Rhodes University, Po Box 94, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa

E-Mail: w.froneman{at}ru.ac.za

Trophic cascading resulting from the coupling between components of the microbial food comprising bacteria, phytoplankton and protozooplankton [nano- (2–20 µm) and microzooplankton (20–200 µm)] and mesozooplankton (copepods) (200–2000 µm) was investigated at three stations in the oligotrophic temperate Kariega estuary during the summer (February) and winter (May) 2001. Total chlorophyll a (Chl a) was dominated by picophytoplankton (<2 µm) throughout the study comprising between 55 and 74% of the total pigment during summer and between 64 and 78% of the total during winter. Among the heterotrophic components of the pelagic food web, nanozooplankton (HNAN) were identified as the most important consumers of bacteria and microzooplankton (MICRO) the primary consumers of Chl a. The low impact of the mesozooplankton (MESO) on the Chl a appears to be related to the size structure of the phytoplankton community in the estuary which is too small to be grazed efficiently by the larger zooplankton. In response to the unfavourable size structure of the phytoplankton community in the estuary, it is suggested that the MESO consume HNAN, MICRO and/or detritus. The negative impact of the MESO on the net growth rates of the HNAN and MICRO resulted in a decrease in the feeding impact of these organisms on the Chl a < 2 µm and bacteria. This result is consistent with the expectations of predator–prey cascades.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
F. Azemar, S. Bouletreau, M. Lionard, K. Muylaert, W. Vyverman, P. Meire, and M. Tackx
Looking for general trends in trophic interactions among estuarine micro- and mesozooplankton
J. Plankton Res., March 1, 2007; 29(suppl_1): i135 - i147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.