Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patoine, A.
Right arrow Articles by Prepas, E. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Patoine, A.
Right arrow Articles by Prepas, E. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.24 no.6 pp.601-616, 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002

Influence of catchment deforestationby logging and natural forest fires on crustacean community size structure in lakes of the Eastern Boreal Canadian forest

A. Patoine, B. Pinel-Alloul and E. E. Prepas1

Groupe De Recherche Interuniversitaire En Limnologie Et En Environnement Aquatique (gril), Département De Sciences Biologiques, Université De Montréal, C.P. 6128, SucC. Centre-Ville, Montréal, Qc, H3c 3j7 and 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Ab, T6g 2e9, Canada

patoinea{at}colba.net

Logging and wildfires are important perturbation factors of the Canadian Boreal forest, but their effects on aquatic communities remain largely unknown. Here, we assess the ecological effects of logging and wildfires on aquatic communities, based on changes in crustacean zooplankton size spectra among logged, burnt and unperturbed lakes of the Canadian Precambrian Boreal Shield. A laboratory version of the Optical Particle Counter (OPC-1L) was used to establish the crustacean size spectra of zooplankton samples collected in 38 lakes characterized by different catchment conditions: logged in 1995 (nine ‘logged' lakes); burnt in 1995 (nine ‘burnt' lakes); left unperturbed over the past 70 years (20 reference lakes). Size spectra are characterized by crustacean biovolume in 22 size classes, from 200–300 µm equivalent spherical diameter (ESD) to 2300–2400 µm ESD. Size spectra in logged and burnt lakes were on average shifted towards larger size classes relative to reference lakes, although the reference and burnt groups of lakes were the only pair statistically different from one another (at {alpha} = 5%). As a result, biovolume of crustacean organisms >1100 µm ESD in burnt lakes was on average higher by 366 and 388%, respectively, 1 and 2 years following catchment perturbations relative to reference lakes. Among a set of 15 water quality variables and 14 fish species density variables, potassium concentration and white sucker density were the most important environmental correlates of crustacean size structure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
S. I. Dodson, A. L. Newman, S. Will-Wolf, M. L. Alexander, M. P. Woodford, and S. Van Egeren
The relationship between zooplankton community structure and lake characteristics in temperate lakes (Northern Wisconsin, USA)
J. Plankton Res., January 1, 2009; 31(1): 93 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
W. Sousa, J. L. Attayde, E. D. S. Rocha, and E. M. Eskinazi-Sant'Anna
The response of zooplankton assemblages to variations in the water quality of four man-made lakes in semi-arid northeastern Brazil
J. Plankton Res., June 1, 2008; 30(6): 699 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
A. Patoine, B. Pinel-Alloul, G. Methot, and M.-J. Leblanc
Correspondence among methods of zooplankton biomass measurement in lakes: effect of community composition on optical plankton counter and size-fractionated seston data
J. Plankton Res., July 1, 2006; 28(7): 695 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.