Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (25)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Miralto, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Turner, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Miralto, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.24 no.11 pp.1185-1195, 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002

Zooplankton feeding ecology: does a diet of Phaeocystis support good copepod grazing, survival, egg production and egg hatching success?

Jefferson T. Turner*, Adrianna Ianora1, Francesco Esposito1, Ylenia Carotenuto1 and Antonio Miralto1

School for Marine Science and Technology, University Of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 706 South Rodney French Boulevard, New Bedford, Ma 02744, USA and 1 Stazione Zoologica ‘anton Dohrn’, Villa Communale, Naples, Italy

* Corresponding Author: jturner{at}umassd.edu

The bloom-forming alga Phaeocystis is ingested by a variety of zooplankton grazers, but is thought to be a poor source of food. We examined copepod grazing on solitary Phaeocystis cells by adult females of Temora stylifera, and survival, fecal pellet production, egg production and egg hatching success in Calanus helgolandicus and T. stylifera over periods of 15 consecutive days. Phaeocystis cell concentrations were high (1.2–3.6 x 104 cells ml–1 for C. helgolandicus and 2.5–7.9 x 104 cells ml–1 for T. stylifera), but within the range of maxima recorded for natural blooms. Both copepods survived well and continuously produced fecal pellets (indicating continuous grazing) on a diet of Phaeocystis. However, egg production rates for both copepods were low, even though hatching success of the few eggs produced was high. Clearance rates for T. stylifera were higher than for most previous measurements of other copepods feeding on Phaeocystis solitary cells at lower cell concentrations. We conclude that even though copepods feed well upon Phaeocystis, resulting poor fecundity on this diet may inhibit copepod population increases during blooms, thereby contributing to the perpetuation of blooms. However, the high egg hatching success on this diet argues against Phaeocystis containing chemical compounds that act as mitotic inhibitors reducing copepod egg viability, such as those found in some other phytoplankters.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. D. Long, G. W. Smalley, T. Barsby, J. T. Anderson, and M. E. Hay
Chemical cues induce consumer-specific defenses in a bloom-forming marine phytoplankton
PNAS, June 19, 2007; 104(25): 10512 - 10517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
G. S. Caldwell, S. B. Watson, and M. G. Bentley
How to assess toxin ingestion and post-ingestion partitioning in zooplankton?
J. Plankton Res., December 1, 2004; 26(12): 1369 - 1377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
J. Urban-Rich, J. T McCarty, and M. Shailer
Effects of food concentration and diet on chromophoric dissolved organic matter accumulation and fluorescent composition during grazing experiments with the copepod Calanus finmarchicus
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2004; 61(4): 542 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.