Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grunewald, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Castro, L. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Grunewald, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Castro, L. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.24 no.1 pp.55-67, 2002
© Oxford University Press 2002

Grazing impact of copepod assemblages and gravitational flux in coastal and oceanic waters off central Chile during two contrasting seasons

A. C. Grunewald1, C. E. Morales1, H. E. Gonzalez2, C. Sylvester1 and L. R. Castro3

1 Estacion de Biologia Marina, D. Oceanografia, Universidad de Concepcion, Casilla 44, Dichato, 2 Instituto de Biologia Marina, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, 3 Departamento de Oceanografia, Universidad de Concepcion, Casilla 160-c, Concepcion, Chile

Corresponding Author: A. C. Grunewald. E-mail: camorale{at}udec.cl

In evaluating carbon flux in coastal and oceanic waters off central Chile (~36°S), the grazing pressure by copepod size-assemblages and the gravitational flux from the surface layer were estimated during two contrasting seasons: spring upwelling (October 1998) and winter (July 1999) periods. Grazing pressure upon phytoplankton biomass was small (<5%) during both periods at all stations. It was, however, an important proportion of primary production at the coast during the spring (17–43%) but minimal in winter (<5%) while, at the oceanic station, it was significant during both seasons (13–46%). Similarly, the downward flux of particulate organic carbon was a significant percentage of primary production at the coast during the spring (31%) and less so in winter (15%); at the oceanic station, it was a higher fraction during both seasons (46–47%). Copepod pellets were only a minor component of the faecal flux, suggesting that they were rapidly recycled in the water column. The seasonal differences in these carbon fluxes in the coastal upwelling zone were related directly to the larger quantities of organic matter in the water column during the spring upwelling period, including higher chlorophyll a concentrations and primary production rates. During the winter, the particulate organic carbon appears to be mainly recycled in the water column. In the oceanic zone, in contrast to what is expected, a large percentage of the primary production appears to be exported during both periods, though consumption by copepod assemblages was also important, suggesting significant horizontal carbon export from the coast to the open ocean.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
L. Blanco-Bercial, F. Alvarez-Marques, and J. A. Cabal
Changes in the mesozooplankton community associated with the hydrography off the northwestern Iberian Peninsula
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2006; 63(5): 799 - 810.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
D. Bottjer and C. E. Morales
Microzooplankton grazing in a coastal embayment off Concepcion, Chile, (~36{degrees} S) during non-upwelling conditions
J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2005; 27(4): 383 - 391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.