Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Knutsen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Calise, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Knutsen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Calise, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.23 no.8 pp.859-873, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001

Determining the mass density of marine copepods and their eggs with a critical focus on some of the previously used methods

Tor Knutsen1, Webjorn Melle1 and Lucio Calise2,3

1 Institute Of Marine Research (imr), Nordnesgaten 50, P.O. Box 1870 Nordnes, N-5817 Bergen, Norway; 2 Centro Marino Internazionale (imc), LoC. Sa Mardini, I-09072 Torregrande (or), Italy

3 Present Address: Istituto Di Ricerche Sulle Risorse Marine E L'ambiente Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (irma-Cnr), Via L. Vaccara 61, 91026 Mazara Del Vallo (tp), Italy

We collected Calanus finmarchicus copepodites CIV, CV and CVI females in a deep fjord on the west coast of Norway during April 1996, May 1997 and November 1998. Eggs of C. finmarchicus and Calanus glacialis were collected during May 1989 in the Barents Sea. The sinking speeds of animals and eggs were measured in a homogeneous column with seawater of known density, and Stokes law was applied to estimate their mass density. Also the density contrast between the organisms and seawater was calculated. The mean mass density of C. finmarchicus ranged from 1.0274 to 1.0452 g cm–3. During spring copepodite stage CV had a significantly lower mean mass density (1.0345 g cm–3) compared to CIV (1.0381 g cm–3) and CVI females (1.0408 g cm–3). Copepods collected during winter had a distinctly lower mass density. The sinking speed of C. glacialis eggs followed a unimodal distribution, with a mean of 25.9 m day–1, while sinking speeds of C. finmarchicus eggs were bimodal, the two groups of eggs having a mean sinking speed of 23.3 m day–1 and 35.4 m day–1 respectively. Correspondingly the mean mass density was 1.0556 g cm–3 for C. glacialis eggs and for the two groups of C. finmarchicus eggs 1.0639 g cm–3 and 1.0812 g cm–3. Results of earlier work, particularly using density gradient methods to determine mass density of zooplankton, are critically reviewed, and it is suggested that this method should not be used to determine the mass density of small organisms the size of C. finmarchicus.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
D. Chu and P.H. Wiebe
Measurements of sound-speed and density contrasts of zooplankton in Antarctic waters
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2005; 62(4): 818 - 831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
E. Malkiel, J. Sheng, J. Katz, and J. R. Strickler
The three-dimensional flow field generated by a feeding calanoid copepod measured using digital holography
J. Exp. Biol., October 15, 2003; 206(20): 3657 - 3666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
D. Chu, P. H. Wiebe, N. J. Copley, G. L. Lawson, and V. Puvanendran
Material properties of North Atlantic cod eggs and early-stage larvae and their influence on acoustic scattering
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2003; 60(3): 508 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.