Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hambright, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Fishbein, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hambright, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Fishbein, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.23 no.2 pp.165-174, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001

Effects of zooplankton grazing and nutrients on the bloom-forming, N2-fixing cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon in Lake Kinneret

K. David Hambright,1, Tamar Zohary, James Easton, Bonnie Azoulay and Tatiana Fishbein

Israel Oceanographic And Limnological Research, The Yigal Allon Kinneret Limnological Laboratory, P.O. Box 345, Tiberias 14102, Israel,

1 Present Address: University Of Oklahoma Biological Station, Hc-71, Box 205, Kingston, Oh 73439, Usa

A bloom of the filamentous, N2-fixing cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon ovalisporum Forti occurred for the first time in Lake Kinneret during late summer and fall 1994. During subsequent years (1995–1999), Aphanizomenon also appeared in late summer and fall, but did not bloom. In outdoor microcosm experiments, we examined zooplankton grazing on Lake Kinneret phytoplankton, with and without Aphanizomenon present, and the effects of N, P and N:P ratios on phytoplankton growth. In one-day feeding experiments, clearance and grazing rates of the ambient Lake Kinneret zooplankton assemblage feeding in lake water dominated by Aphanizomenon were 10-fold lower than in water without Aphanizomenon. We suspect that the low grazing rates were due to interference caused by the presence of Aphanizomenon. In 9-day nutrient addition experiments, significant enhancement effects on phytoplankton were detected with additions of either P or N; a high N:P was better for phytoplankton growth than a low N:P. After 7 days, bottles receiving low P and no N additions were dominated by Oscillatoria sp. and Closterium acutum; few Aphanizomenon were present. In contrast, bottles receiving high P and N additions had large increases of Aphanizomenon, as well as Oscillatoria and Closterium. There was a tendency for more green algae and diatoms with increasing N additions. These results provide evidence that (i) non-grazeability of Aphanizomenon enabled it to gain a competitive advantage over grazeable phytoplankton, and (ii) that nutrient limitation, but not grazing, was probably important in the eventual decline of the Aphanizomenon bloom.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.