Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (46)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ciros-Pérez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Serra, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ciros-Pérez, J.
Right arrow Articles by Serra, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.23 no.12 pp.1311-1328, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001

On the taxonomy of three sympatric sibling species of the Brachionus plicatilis (Rotifera) complex from Spain, with the description of B. ibericus n. sp.

Jorge Ciros-Pérez1, Africa Gómez2 and Manuel Serra1

1 Institut Cavanilles de Biodiversitat I Biologia Evolutiva, Universitat de València, A.O. 22085, València 46071, Spain, 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, UK

jorge.ciros{at}uv.es

The accumulation of evidence during the last decade led to the splitting of the Brachionus plicatilis complex (Rotifera) into two morphologically recognizable species: B. plicatilis Müller and B. rotundiformis Tschugunoff, previously referred to as L- and S-type B. plicatilis (s.l.), respectively. However, recent population genetics and molecular studies have revealed that each of these taxa concern cryptic species complexes. In particular, in Torreblanca Marsh, a wetland on the Mediterranean coast of Spain, three genetically distinct groups in this rotifer complex have been shown to co-occur. Differences in genetic markers, ecological preferences, mixis responses, mating behaviour and no evidence of gene flow between them have led to the conclusion that they must be considered as three different biological species. In this study we present a detailed comparative analysis using light and scanning electron microscopy of laboratory strains enabling a morphological characterization of the three species. Fine morphology and morphometry revealed taxonomic characters constant enough to recognize three well-defined morphologies, which always correspond with the respective biological species identified. Since no type material of both B. plicatilis and B. rotundiformis is available, we designed our Spanish clones as neotypes, which would allow further comparative work. Furthermore, B. ibericus n. sp. is described. This study sets the first step for a complete characterization of the biological diversity contained within this economically important species complex.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
G. B. McManus and L. A. Katz
Molecular and morphological methods for identifying plankton: what makes a successful marriage?
J. Plankton Res., October 1, 2009; 31(10): 1119 - 1129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
K. Suga, D. B. Mark Welch, Y. Tanaka, Y. Sakakura, and A. Hagiwara
Two Circular Chromosomes of Unequal Copy Number Make Up the Mitochondrial Genome of the Rotifer Brachionus plicatilis
Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2008; 25(6): 1129 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
R. L. Wallace
Rotifers: Exquisite Metazoans
Integr. Comp. Biol., July 1, 2002; 42(3): 660 - 667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.