Journal of Plankton Research Vol.23 no.11 pp.1297-1310, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001
Nanoflagellate predation on auto- and heterotrophic picoplankton in the oligotrophic Mediterranean Sea
1 Ncmr Aghios Kosmas, 16604 Hellinikon, Greece; 2 Microbiologie Marine, Cnrs, Ep 2032, Campus De Luminy, Case 907, 13 288, Marseille, Cedex 9, France; 3 Laboratoire D'océanologie Et De Biogéochimie, Cnrs Umr 6535, Université De La Mediterranée, 163 Avenue De Luminy, Case 901, 13 288 Marseille Cedex 9, France;
4 Corresponding Author: E-Mail: URANIA{at}ERATO.FL.NCMR.GR
Dynamics of autotrophic and heterotrophic prokaryotes and their consumption by nanoflagellates were studied in the euphotic zone at nine stations located from the Levantine Basin (34°E) to the Balearic sea (5°E) in June 1999. Bacterial biomass constituted the largest proportion of living biomass at all stations. Integrated bacterial production at the furthest east station, was sixfold lower than integrated bacterial production at the furthest west (13 and 75 mg C m-2 d-1 respectively). Estimated heterotrophic nanoflagellate bacterivory accounted for 45–87% of bacterial production. Small protists (<3 µm) dominated the bacterivore assemblage and accounted for more than 90% of the heterotrophic bacterial consumption. Our results indicated that there was no negative selection against Synechococcus and that both picoplankton groups were grazed according to their standing stocks. An estimated consumption of Synechococcus derived from food vacuole content analysis of nanoflagellates revealed that they consumed from 0.5 to 45% (mean 13%) of Synechococcus stock per day. These data are among the first documenting the relative grazing impact of heterotrophic nanoflagellates on bacteria and Synechococcus in situ. Assuming that there was no selection for or against Prochlorococcus, heterotrophic nanoflagellates could ingest from 1.4 to 21% (mean 6%) of Prochlorococcus stock per day. The amount of organic carbon obtained by heterotrophic nanoflagellates from photosynthetic prokaryotes represented 27% of the total amount of carbon obtained from total prokaryotes
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R.-A. Sandaa and A. Larsen Seasonal Variations in Virus-Host Populations in Norwegian Coastal Waters: Focusing on the Cyanophage Community Infecting Marine Synechococcus spp. Appl. Envir. Microbiol., July 1, 2006; 72(7): 4610 - 4618. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. A. Cuevas and C. E. Morales Nanoheterotroph grazing on bacteria and cyanobacteria in oxic and suboxic waters in coastal upwelling areas off northern Chile J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2006; 28(4): 385 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. R. Anderson and C. M. Turley Low bacterial growth efficiency in the oligotrophic eastern Mediterranean Sea: a modelling analysis J. Plankton Res., September 1, 2003; 25(9): 1011 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|