Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richardot, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dévaux, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richardot, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dévaux, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.23 no.11 pp.1249-1261, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001

Influence of cladoceran grazing activity on dissolved organic matter, enzymatic hydrolysis and bacterial growth

M. Richardot1,3, D. Debroas1, A. Thouvenot1, D. Sargos1, J. L. Berthon2 and J. Dévaux1

1 Université Blaise PascaL. Laboratoire De Biologie Des ProtisteS. Umr Cnrs 6023. 63177 Aubière Cedex, France 2 Université Dest-EtiennE. Laboratoire De BiologiE. 42023 St-Etienne Cedex 2, France

3 Corresponding Author: M. Richardot; E-Mail, MATHILDA.RICHARDOT{at}LBP.UNIV-BPELEOMENT.FR

To assess the influence of grazing by cladocerans on dissolved organic matter (DOM), glycolytic and proteolytic activities and bacterial growth were measured by in situ incubation of lake water from the epilimnion of an oligotrophic reservoir in three different treatments: in absence of zooplankton, and in presence of zooplankton (natural abundance and concentrated four-fold). These experiments were conducted at two periods in the succession of plankton populations (May and June 1998), that differed in the quality of the prey ingested (Eudorina sp. compared to Cryptomonas sp. and Rhodomonas sp.) and their grazing intensity (31.8 ± 2.2 µg C l–1 day–1 compared to 10.2 ± 0.5 µg C l–1 day–1). A systematic increase in bacterial biomass was measured in the treatments containing the highest zooplankton concentrations. The DOM concentrations produced in situ showed few significant differences between the three treatments, but the assimilation of DOM was higher in the presence of zooplankton than in their absence. These results show that the influence of cladocerans on the DOM was more of a qualitative than a quantitative nature. The protein compounds derived from the grazing activities of metazoans seem to be a major nutrient source for growth for bacteria (r = 0.81, P <0.05). In this study, the highest hydrolytic activities were recorded in the presence of high concentrations of metazoan zooplankton. However, the processes that regulated these activities differed between the two experimental dates (repression compared to enzyme stimulation). Grazing activities could lead to an increase in phytoplanktonic excretion during the growth phase, and therefore the production of low molecular weight compounds that are easily assimilated by the bacterial plankton.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.