Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lugomela, C.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lugomela, C.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, T. G.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.23 no.10 pp.1121-1136, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001

Plankton composition and cycling of carbon during the rainy season in a tropical coastal ecosystem, Zanzibar, Tanzania

Charles Lugomela, Petra Wallberg,1,3 and Torkel Gissel Nielsen,2

Institute Of Marine Sciences, University Of Dar Es Salaam, Po Box 668, Zanzibar, Tanzania, 1 Institute Of Applied Environmental Research, Stockholm University, Se-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden and 2 Department Of Marine Ecology, National Environmental Research Institute, Frederiksborgvej 399, Dk-4000 Roskilde, Denmark

3 To Whom Correspondence Should Be Addressed At: Swedish Radiation Protection Agency, Se-171 16 Stockholm, Sweden

Biomass, species composition and production of the planktonic community were investigated during the rainy season in May and June 1999 outside Zanzibar Island, Tanzania. In general, the plankton biomass of different organisms was uniform between depths as well as over time. The integrated water column primary production ranged from 204 to 4142 mg C m–2 day–1. Bacterial production varied between 10 and 72 mg C m–2 day–1, comprising ~5% of the total bacterial standing stock. The data obtained from these experiments are summarized in a carbon budget. At the most 77% of the total primary production channelled through the heterotrophic flagellates, ciliates and heterotrophic dinoflagellates to higher trophic levels. Of the estimated carbon demand for mesozooplankton, 28% could potentially be met by ciliates and heterotrophic dinoflagellates.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
L. K. Miyashita, M. d. Melo Junior, and R. M. Lopes
Estuarine and oceanic influences on copepod abundance and production of a subtropical coastal area
J. Plankton Res., June 9, 2009; (2009) fbp039v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
C. Jaspers, T. G. Nielsen, J. Carstensen, R. R. Hopcroft, and E. F. Moller
Metazooplankton distribution across the Southern Indian Ocean with emphasis on the role of Larvaceans
J. Plankton Res., May 1, 2009; 31(5): 525 - 540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
S. Zervoudaki, E. D. Christou, T. G. Nielsen, I. Siokou-Frangou, G. Assimakopoulou, A. Giannakourou, M. Maar, K. Pagou, E. Krasakopoulou, U. Christaki, et al.
The importance of small-sized copepods in a frontal area of the Aegean Sea
J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2007; 29(4): 317 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.