Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Martin, L. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.23 no.1 pp.1-10, 2001
© Oxford University Press 2001

Limitations on the Use of Impermeable Mesocosms for Ecological Experiments Involving Aurelia sp. (Scyphozoa: Semaeostomeae)

Laura E. Martin

Department of Organismic Biology, Ecology, and Evolution, University of California, Los Angeles, 621 Charles E. Young Dr., South, Box 951606, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1606, USA

Microcosms permit controlled ecological experiments but the effects of small enclosures on predators, prey, and their interactions, compromise their relevance to field populations. I examined the effects of Aurelia size on the utility of impermeable mesocosms deployed in highly stable water columns. Aurelia of all sizes (5-29 cm bell diameter) were observed adhered to walls. Individuals larger than 10 cm adhered to walls in disproportionately high numbers, experienced a significant decline in mean size, and incurred physical damage at greater rates, than those less than 10 cm. These results demonstrate that, at least for impermeable walled mesocosms deployed in low turbulence environments, larger enclosures will not necessarily (i) ameliorate wall effects for animals of the size typically manipulated in microcosms and (ii) make enclosures suitable for manipulating Aurelia larger than those normally enclosed in microcosms. The mechanism proposed to explain adhesion suggests that enclosure walls alter the hydrodynamics of fluid flow around Aurelia, which may have implications for estimating the predation impact of these animals since the hydrodynamics of feeding and swimming have co-evolved.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
T. Jankowski, T. Strauss, and H. T. Ratte
Trophic interactions of the freshwater jellyfish Craspedacusta sowerbii
J. Plankton Res., August 1, 2005; 27(8): 811 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.