Journal of Plankton Research Vol.22 no.8 pp.1559-1577, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000
Zooplankton grazing on bacteria and phytoplankton in a regulated large river (Nakdong River, Korea)
1 Department of Biology, Pusan National University, Pusan, 609-735 and 2 Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul, 143-701, South Korea
3 Present address: Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Department of Shallow Lakes and Lowland Rivers, Müggelseedamm 301,D-12562 Berlin, Germany
Zooplankton grazing on bacteria and phytoplankton was evaluated at monthly intervals, from March 1998 to March 1999, in the lower Nakdong River, Korea. We quantified bacterial and phytoplankton carbon contents, and measured carbon ingestion rates (CIRs) by two size classes of zooplankton: (i) microzooplankton (MICZ), ranging in size from 35 to 157 µm and including rotifers and nauplii, but protists were excluded; and (ii) macrozooplankton (MACZ), of a size larger than 157 µm and including cladocerans and copepods. Two types of laboratory grazing experiments were carried out to quantify zooplankton grazing on bacteria and phytoplankton. Species-specific and community filtering rates were measured in the feeding experiments with representative fluorescent microspheres (FM): 0.75 µm FM for bacteria and 10 µm FM for phytoplankton. CIRs were measured using natural bacterial and phytoplankton communities in the zooplankton density manipulation experiments. Bacterial carbon was considerably lower (average ± SD: 36 ± 24 µg C l–1, n = 25) than phytoplankton carbon (383 ± 274 µg C l–1, n = 25). Total zooplankton carbon (236 ± 520 µg C l–1) was usually dominated (>65%) by the MICZ fraction. Rotifers were the dominant taxonomic group. Bacterial carbon was positively related to both MICZ and MACZ carbon (P < 0.05) seasonally, but phytoplankton carbon was not. The community filtering rates (CFRs; ml l–1 day–1) and biomass grazing rate (G; % day–1) of MICZ, on both bacteria and phytoplankton, were always higher than those measured for MACZ. MICZ CIRs on bacteria (average 5.3 ± 5.5 µg C l–1 day–1) and phytoplankton (<35 µm in size) (average 63 ± 28 µg C l–1 day–1) were ~twofold higher than MACZ CIRs. On average, MICZ accounted for 70 and 83% of total zooplankton grazing on bacteria and phytoplankton, respectively. Considering the total zooplankton community, MICZ generally were more important than MACZ as grazers of bacteria and phytoplankton. Rotifers, in particular, played an important role in transferring both bacterial and phytoplankton carbon to higher trophic levels in the lower Nakdong River ecosystem.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Joaquim-Justo, S. Pirlot, L. Viroux, P. Servais, J.-P. Thome, and J.-P. Descy Trophic links in the lowland River Meuse (Belgium): assessing the role of bacteria and protozoans in planktonic food webs J. Plankton Res., September 1, 2006; 28(9): 857 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Agasild and T. Noges Cladoceran and rotifer grazing on bacteria and phytoplankton in two shallow eutrophic lakes: in situ measurement with fluorescent microspheres J. Plankton Res., November 1, 2005; 27(11): 1155 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Joaquim-Justo, C. Detry, F. Caufman, and J.-P. Thome Feeding of planktonic rotifers on ciliates: a method using natural ciliate assemblages labelled with fluorescent microparticles J. Plankton Res., November 1, 2004; 26(11): 1289 - 1299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Kozak and R. Goldyn Zooplankton versus phyto- and bacterioplankton in the Maltanski Reservoir (Poland) during an extensive biomanipulation experiment J. Plankton Res., January 1, 2004; 26(1): 37 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Viroux Seasonal and longitudinal aspects of microcrustacean (Cladocera, Copepoda) dynamics in a lowland river J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2002; 24(4): 281 - 292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|