Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gliwicz, Z.M.
Right arrow Articles by Wojciechowska, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gliwicz, Z.M.
Right arrow Articles by Wojciechowska, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.22 no.8 pp.1539-1557, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000

Daphnia populations in three interconnected lakes with roach as the principal planktivore

Z.Maciej Gliwicz, Anna Ewa Rutkowska and Joanna Wojciechowska

Department of Hydrobiology, University of Warsaw, Banacha 2, Warsaw, Poland

Data on two co-existing Daphnia species, D.cucullata (G.O.Sars) and D.hyalina (Leydig), from three neighboring and interconnected lakes in northern Poland, revealed an extremely confined range of population density fluctuations throughout summer in each of the two species in each of the three lakes, with D.cucullata being an order of magnitude more abundant than D.hyalina (mean of 11.5 ind. l–1 for D.cucullata and 1.1 ind. l–1 for D.hyalina with 95% confidence limits of ±2.5 and ±0.5 ind. l–1, respectively), in spite of markedly changing fecundity. There was no apparent phase of decline or increase that could be related to the distinct phases of low or high fecundity resulting from different food levels. Analysis of the gut contents of roach (Rutilus rutilus), the dominant planktivore in the three lakes, revealed identical selectivity for each of the two Daphnia species, suggesting that the lower density of the D.hyalina population was compensated for by the greater conspicuousness of individuals of this species. It is concluded that the population density of these Daphnia species remains far below the carrying capacity of the habitat and does not depend on food levels. Food availability merely sets the rate of population increase, while the actual population density in the lakes studied reflects the species' vulnerability to predation by planktivorous fish.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.