Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calbet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Arin, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Calbet, A.
Right arrow Articles by Arin, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.22 no.7 pp.1393-1402, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000


Short Communication

Naupliar growth versus egg production in the calanoid copepod Centropages typicus

Albert Calbet, Isabel Trepat and Laura Arin

Institut de Ciències del Mar, CSIC, Departament de Biologia Marina i Oceanografia, Passeig Joan de Borbó s/n, 08039 Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain

Growth rates of the copepod Centropages typicus were assessed during May 1998 in the Alboran Sea. The goal of the work was to compare field growth rates of juvenile (artificial cohort method) and adult copepods (female egg production rates) under an extensive range of natural conditions. The results showed that adult and juvenile growth rates were similar in some stations, while in others no such relationship was apparent. In contrast to the common belief that juvenile growth may be saturated under natural conditions whereas adults may be food-limited, in most of our study, adult growth rates were greater than juveniles. We discuss these results in the light of food availability at the surveyed stations. In summary, the assumption that copepod growth rates estimated through egg production rates of adults are equivalent to juvenile growth is not always valid.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.