Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plante, A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Arts, M.T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Plante, A.J.
Right arrow Articles by Arts, M.T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.22 no.7 pp.1277-1298, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000

Effects of chronic, low levels of UV radiation on carbon allocation in Cryptomonas erosa and competition between C.erosa and bacteria in continuous cultures

A.J. Plante1,2 and M.T. Arts2,3

1 Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, 112 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, S7N 5E2 and 2 Aquatic Ecosytem Impacts Branch, National Water Research Institute, 867 Lakeshore Road, P.O. Box 5050, Burlington, Ontario, Canada L7R 4A6

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed

We conducted a long term (4 week) continuous culture study to measure the chronic effects of UV radiation on the alga, Cryptomonas erosa, using three different fluence rates of UV radiation. We measured carbon allocation into carbohydrate, protein and lipid pools, as well as chlorophyll a concentrations and algal and bacterial density. After 21 days, algal density in the control and lowest UV treatment (treatment 1 = 3.4 W m–2 UVR unweighted) was significantly lower than in the two highest UV treatments (treatment 2 = 14.9 W m–2 and treatment 3 = 16.2 W m–2 UVR unweighted), and did not recover in the following week of no UV exposure. Chlorophyll a and carbohydrate content (ng algal cell–1) for the control and treatment 1 were clearly lower than treatments 2 and 3 by day 15, and did not recover by day 28. Percentage total lipid for the control and treatment 1 also decreased compared with treatments 2 and 3 by the end of the exposure period. However, by day 21, protein content for the control and treatment 1 was significantly higher than treatments 2 and 3, and demonstrated a further increase by day 28. The results were largely attributed to competition effects between C.erosa and bacteria in these non-axenic cultures. Bacterial density was significantly (x4) higher in the control and lowest UV treatment compared with the two highest UV treatments. Our findings suggest a competitive advantage of phytoplankton over bacteria under these conditions. If UV radiation, in general, affects bacteria to a greater extent than algae, there are likely to be changes in (i) bacterial utilization of dissolved organic matter produced by phytoplankton, (ii) competition between phytoplankton and bacteria for nutrient minerals and (iii) predation rates on bacteria by micro-flagellates.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
F. E. Ogbebo and C. Ochs
Bacterioplankton and phytoplankton production rates compared at different levels of solar ultraviolet radiation and limiting nutrient ratios
J. Plankton Res., November 1, 2008; 30(11): 1271 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
S. L. Cooke and C. E. Williamson
Positive effects of UV radiation on a calanoid copepod in a transparent lake: do competition, predation or food availability play a role?
J. Plankton Res., February 1, 2006; 28(2): 171 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.