Journal of Plankton Research Vol.22 no.6 pp.1155-1166, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000
Remote prey detection in Oithona similis: hydromechanical versus chemical cues
The Norwegian College of Fishery Science, University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway and 1 Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Charlottenlund Castle, DK-2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark
We quantified prey encounter rates and prey reaction distances in the ambush-feeding cyclopoid copepod Oithona similis by video recording freely swimming copepods at different concentrations of prey, the dinoflagellate Gymnodinium dominans. Prey encounter rate increased with prey concentration, and a maximal clearance rate of 0.42 ± 0.10 ml h–1 was estimated. The average distance (from the antennules) at which O.similis reacts to prey is 0.014 ± 0.007 cm. A simple prey encounter model was used to combine observed predator and prey velocities and prey reaction distance, and yielded a clearance rate similar to that estimated directly from prey encounter rates. The observed prey reaction distance was consistent with that estimated from a published model of hydromechanical prey perception. The possibility of remote chemodetection was examined by modeling the distribution of solutes leaking out of a swimming cell. The cell leaves a long slender chemical trail in its wake. However, since the ambush-feeding O.similis is essentially stationary when perceiving prey, it is the width rather than the length of the trail that matters. Owing to advection, the chemical signal vanishes almost instantaneously off the sides of the swimming flagellate, and solute concentrations are below any likely detection threshold within 40–50 µm from the flagellate. Our observations are thus inconsistent with remote chemodetection in O.similis. The considerations are generalized, and it is concluded that ambush-feeding copepods, unlike cruisers and suspension feeders, cannot utilize chemical signals for the detection of individual prey, but rely on either hydromechanical detection or direct interception of prey.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. Kiorboe, A. Andersen, V. J. Langlois, H. H. Jakobsen, and T. Bohr Mechanisms and feasibility of prey capture in ambush-feeding zooplankton PNAS, July 28, 2009; 106(30): 12394 - 12399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Castellani, X. Irigoien, D. J. Mayor, R. P. Harris, and D. Wilson Feeding of Calanus finmarchicus and Oithona similis on the microplankton assemblage in the Irminger Sea, North Atlantic J. Plankton Res., October 1, 2008; 30(10): 1095 - 1116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. D. Wiggert, E. E. Hofmann, and G.-A. Paffenhofer A modelling study of developmental stage and environmental variability effects on copepod foraging ICES J. Mar. Sci., April 1, 2008; 65(3): 379 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Wiggert, A. G. E. Haskell, G.-A. Paffenhofer, E. E. Hofmann, and J. M. Klinck The role of feeding behavior in sustaining copepod populations in the tropical ocean J. Plankton Res., October 1, 2005; 27(10): 1013 - 1031. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. H. Jakobsen, E. Halvorsen, B. W. Hansen, and A. W. Visser Effects of prey motility and concentration on feeding in Acartia tonsa and Temora longicornis: the importance of feeding modes J. Plankton Res., August 1, 2005; 27(8): 775 - 785. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Dangles, C. Magal, D. Pierre, A. Olivier, and J. Casas Variation in morphology and performance of predator-sensing system in wild cricket populations J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2005; 208(3): 461 - 468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Bonnet, J. Titelman, and R. Harris Calanus the cannibal J. Plankton Res., August 1, 2004; 26(8): 937 - 948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. Sommer and U. Sommer {delta}15N signatures of marine mesozooplankton and seston size fractions in Kiel Fjord, Baltic Sea J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2004; 26(4): 495 - 500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Svensen and J. C. Nejstgaard Is sedimentation of copepod faecal pellets determined by cyclopoids? Evidence from enclosed ecosystems J. Plankton Res., August 1, 2003; 25(8): 917 - 926. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. H. Bundy and H. A. Vanderploeg Detection and capture of inert particles by calanoid copepods: the role of the feeding current J. Plankton Res., March 1, 2002; 24(3): 215 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G.-A. Paffenhofer and M. G. Mazzocchi On some aspects of the behaviour of Oithona plumifera (Copepoda: Cyclopoida) J. Plankton Res., February 1, 2002; 24(2): 129 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Saito and T. Kiorboe Feeding rates in the chaetognath Sagitta elegans: effects of prey size, prey swimming behaviour and small-scale turbulence J. Plankton Res., December 1, 2001; 23(12): 1385 - 1398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|