Journal of Plankton Research Vol.22 no.4 pp.761-777, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000
On the reorientation of non-spherical prey particles in a feeding current
Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Department of Marine and Coastal Ecology, Kavalergården, DK-2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark and 1 Tjärnö Marine Biological Laboratory, Göteborg University, SE-452 96 Strömstad, Sweden
Potentially, non-spherical prey can be re-oriented in a flow field and impact on the predator's feeding structures in a non-random manner. Herein, we quantify a process whereby this passive reorientation occurs, and present a model that predicts the orientation of a spheroidal prey as a function of its shape, size and the characteristics of the fluid flow. For a radial flow field, elongated prey tend to align with their long axis parallel to streamlines. This theory is well supported by our results from a laboratory study of cylindrical particles in a siphon flow. The model is extended to a more realistic representation of copepod feeding currents. In this context, the spatial scale over which this process is active is proportional to
1/4 where
is the turbulent dissipation rate. For a range of natural turbulence levels, re-orientation efficiency can range from >90% (low turbulence) to <10% (high turbulence).
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Mann, S. Ott, H. L. Pecseli, and J. Trulsen Laboratory studies of predator-prey encounters in turbulent environments: effects of changes in orientation and field of view J. Plankton Res., May 1, 2006; 28(5): 509 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Bundy and H. A. Vanderploeg Detection and capture of inert particles by calanoid copepods: the role of the feeding current J. Plankton Res., March 1, 2002; 24(3): 215 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Prieto, F. Sommer, H. Stibor, and W. Koeve Effects of Planktonic Copepods on Transparent Exopolymeric Particles (TEP) Abundance and Size Spectra J. Plankton Res., May 1, 2001; 23(5): 515 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Caparroy, U. H. Thygesen, and A. W. Visser Modelling the attack success of planktonic predators: patterns and mechanisms of prey size selectivity J. Plankton Res., October 1, 2000; 22(10): 1871 - 1871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
