Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Visser, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Jonsson, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Visser, A. W.
Right arrow Articles by Jonsson, P. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.22 no.4 pp.761-777, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000

On the reorientation of non-spherical prey particles in a feeding current

André W. Visser and Per R. Jonsson1

Danish Institute for Fisheries Research, Department of Marine and Coastal Ecology, Kavalergården, DK-2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark and 1 Tjärnö Marine Biological Laboratory, Göteborg University, SE-452 96 Strömstad, Sweden

Potentially, non-spherical prey can be re-oriented in a flow field and impact on the predator's feeding structures in a non-random manner. Herein, we quantify a process whereby this passive reorientation occurs, and present a model that predicts the orientation of a spheroidal prey as a function of its shape, size and the characteristics of the fluid flow. For a radial flow field, elongated prey tend to align with their long axis parallel to streamlines. This theory is well supported by our results from a laboratory study of cylindrical particles in a siphon flow. The model is extended to a more realistic representation of copepod feeding currents. In this context, the spatial scale over which this process is active is proportional to {varepsilon} –1/4 where {varepsilon} is the turbulent dissipation rate. For a range of natural turbulence levels, re-orientation efficiency can range from >90% (low turbulence) to <10% (high turbulence).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
J. Mann, S. Ott, H. L. Pecseli, and J. Trulsen
Laboratory studies of predator-prey encounters in turbulent environments: effects of changes in orientation and field of view
J. Plankton Res., May 1, 2006; 28(5): 509 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
M. H. Bundy and H. A. Vanderploeg
Detection and capture of inert particles by calanoid copepods: the role of the feeding current
J. Plankton Res., March 1, 2002; 24(3): 215 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
L. Prieto, F. Sommer, H. Stibor, and W. Koeve
Effects of Planktonic Copepods on Transparent Exopolymeric Particles (TEP) Abundance and Size Spectra
J. Plankton Res., May 1, 2001; 23(5): 515 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
P. Caparroy, U. H. Thygesen, and A. W. Visser
Modelling the attack success of planktonic predators: patterns and mechanisms of prey size selectivity
J. Plankton Res., October 1, 2000; 22(10): 1871 - 1871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.