Journal of Plankton Research Vol.22 no.2 pp.305-319, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000
Grazing experiments with two freshwater zooplankters:fate of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments
1 Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology, Department of Biology, FUNDP, B-5000 Namur, Belgium and 2 CREBS, Centre de Recherches Public—Centre Universitaire (CRP/CU), 162a, av. de la Faïencerie, L-1511 Luxembourg
3 To whom correspondence should be addressed
In order to evaluate the validity of the gut pigment method to assess grazing and diet in two freshwater zooplankters, experiments were carried out to check chlorophyll a and xanthophyll conservation during feeding. For both animals, two sets of experiments were conducted by incubating animals in the laboratory, either isolated from a reservoir (the calanoid copepod, Eudiaptomus gracilis) or cultured under high-food conditions (the cladoceran, Daphnia galeata). For both animals, gut pigments and clearance rates on different types of algae were determined from the same incubations. Chlorophyll a and derivatives, as well as major algal carotenoids, were analysed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). In copepods, the pigment profiles from the gut extracts reflected the diet of the animals poorly. The animal extracts contained almost exclusively alloxanthin (or an alloxanthin-like pigment) in large amounts, whereas the other pigments were lost in high proportions (>70% for lutein and fucoxanthin; 57 and 78% for a-phorbins). The cladocerans fed on the main types of algae abundant in the suspensions, with a preference, however, for small cells. Although the main xanthophylls from these algae were detected in the Daphnia extracts, some destruction of lutein and fucoxanthin may have occurred (18.7 and 30%). The loss rate for alloxanthin seemed more variable (0 and 68%), possibly depending on food concentration. As for the transformation of a-phorbins, E.gracilis and D.galeata behaved quite differently. The HPLC profiles of copepod extracts always showed a very small chlorophyll a peak, along with phaeophytin a and pyrophaeophytin a. Those from the cladoceran exhibited a large phaeophorbide a peak, along with some chlorophyll a and phaeophytin a. In fact, D.galeata did not destroy a-phorbins under our experimental conditions but converted chlorophyll a mainly into phaeophorbide. From a comparison of our results with data from other studies, it seems that in these two zooplankters, use of gut pigment data for quantitative grazing assessment should be considered with caution.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. De Wever, K. Muylaert, K. Van der Gucht, S. Pirlot, C. Cocquyt, J.-P. Descy, P.-D. Plisnier, and W. Vyverman Bacterial Community Composition in Lake Tanganyika: Vertical and Horizontal Heterogeneity Appl. Envir. Microbiol., September 1, 2005; 71(9): 5029 - 5037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Darchambeau and I. Thys In situ filtration responses of Daphnia galeata to changes in food quality J. Plankton Res., March 1, 2005; 27(3): 227 - 236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Thys, B. Leporcq, and J.-P. Descy Seasonal shifts in phytoplankton ingestion by Daphnia galeata, assessed by analysis of marker pigments J. Plankton Res., December 1, 2003; 25(12): 1471 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|