Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suchman, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Suchman, C. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.22 no.12 pp.2307-2323, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000

Escape behavior of Acartia hudsonica copepods during interactions with scyphomedusae

Cynthia L. Suchman

National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230, USA

Calanoid copepods possess remarkable abilities to detect and escape from hydrodynamic disturbances, such as those created by approaching predators. At the same time, a number of studies in coastal ecosystems have suggested that gelatinous predators, including medusae in the Class Scyphozoa, exert top-down control on copepod populations. Although prey escape behavior plays a critical role in predation models, we have relatively little empirical data on how copepods respond to encounters with scyphomedusae. In this study, I used video to quantify encounter rates and escape behaviors of the copepod Acartia hudsonica during interactions with two scyphomedusae, Aurelia aurita and Cyanea sp., in two flow regimes. Escapes were complex, variable and effective. Fewer than 1% of encounters resulted in ingestion. Typically, A.hudsonica avoided contact by responding when predators remained several body lengths (4 to 10 mm) distant and stringing together many escape jumps at submaximum velocities (33 to 59 mm s–1). In addition, copepodite stages behaved passively—or failed to respond—following encounters with medusae more often than did adults. Because escape behavior exhibited by A.hudsonica was so variable, it is unlikely that medusae capture copepods using a single, quantifiable mechanism. A range of responses within populations and individuals may be the best strategy for zooplankton faced with strong predation pressure from a variety of predators.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
P. A. Heuch, M. H. Doall, and J. Yen
Water flow around a fish mimic attracts a parasitic and deters a planktonic copepod
J. Plankton Res., March 1, 2007; 29(suppl_1): i3 - i16.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
C. L. Suchman and B. K. Sullivan
Effect of prey size on vulnerability of copepods to predation by the scyphomedusae Aurelia aurita and Cyanea sp.
J. Plankton Res., December 1, 2000; 22(12): 2289 - 2306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.