Journal of Plankton Research Vol.22 no.1 pp.137-150, 2000
© Oxford University Press 2000
Can an optical plankton counter produce reasonable estimates of zooplankton abundance and biovolume in water with high detritus?
Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD 21613 and 1 Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA
The Optical Plankton Counter (OPC) has been used in oceanic and fresh waters to estimate zooplankton abundance and biovolume. However, it is not clear whether the OPC can produce accurate estimates of zooplankton abundance and biovolume in waters with high detritus. In order to test the capability of the OPC to estimate zooplankton abundance and biovolume in Chesapeake Bay, two sets of laboratory experiments were conducted using water with high detritus concentrations collected from the upper Choptank estuary of Chesapeake Bay and laboratory cultured Artemia. Our results suggest that the OPC is able to produce accurate estimates of zooplankton biovolume after correcting for the influence of background detritus in all the detritus concentrations used, but accurate estimates of zooplankton abundance only in water with background detritus <100 particles l1. The relationship between light attenuation and OPC background particle concentrations provides a useful way to estimate OPC background particle concentrations when direct OPC background particle measurements are not available. Light attenuation corrected OPC particle abundance and particle volume gave accurate estimates of zooplankton abundance and biovolume. However, the accuracy of the corrected OPC measurements by the estimated background particle concentrations was not as high as the corrected OPC measurements by the direct background particle measurements.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Patoine, B. Pinel-Alloul, G. Methot, and M.-J. Leblanc Correspondence among methods of zooplankton biomass measurement in lakes: effect of community composition on optical plankton counter and size-fractionated seston data J. Plankton Res., July 1, 2006; 28(7): 695 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Herman, B. Beanlands, and E. F. Phillips The next generation of Optical Plankton Counter: the Laser-OPC J. Plankton Res., October 1, 2004; 26(10): 1135 - 1145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Baumgartner Comparisons of Calanus finmarchicus fifth copepodite abundance estimates from nets and an optical plankton counter J. Plankton Res., July 1, 2003; 25(7): 855 - 868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. B. Cook and G. C. Hays Comparison of the epipelagic zooplankton samples from a U-Tow and the traditional WP2 net J. Plankton Res., September 1, 2001; 23(9): 953 - 962. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
