Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hutchins, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hutchins, D.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research, Vol 21, 1753-1764, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Assimilation of Fe and carbon by marine copepods from Fe-limited and Fe-replete diatom prey

M Schmidt, Y Zhang and D Hutchins
College of Marine studies, University of Delaware, 700 Pilottown Road, Lewes DE 19958, USA; Corresponding author

Previous studies have demonstrated that growth of marine phytoplankton, bacteria and protozoa can be limited by the availability of Fe. We report evidence that the amount of Fe assimilated by crustacean grazers is affected by the Fe status of their pry. 59Fe and 14C radiotracers were used to follow the fate of Fe and carbon during trophic transfer from diatoms to copepods. Fe assimilation efficiency was higher for copepods ingesting Fe-limited Thalassiosira weissflogii (17%) compared to diatoms that were not limited by Fe (10%), but assimilated Fe was lost more rapidly by copepods ingesting Fe-limited prey. Fe:C assimilation ratios were lower in copepods (5-12 mol Fe:mol C) than the cellular ratios of the phytoplankton prey (17-35 mol Fe:mol C), suggesting that copepods do not accumulate Fe relative to C during grazing. The largest single fate for Fe and C after grazing was regeneration to dissolved pools. Fe:C ratios in dissolved pools were approximately equal to the ratios in the original prey, but Fe:C ratios were higher in particular pools (largely fecal pellets), which should facilitate the export of Fe from the euphotic zone relative to C. Although copepod grazing does recycle cellular Fe and C, our results indicate that grazing may also tend to enhance Fe stress for lower trophic levels by removing Fe from the euphotic zone faster than C.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.