Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertoni, R.
Right arrow Articles by Callieri, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bertoni, R.
Right arrow Articles by Callieri, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research, Vol 21, 1373-1388, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Effects of UVB radiation on freshwater autotrophic and heterotrophic picoplankton in a subalpine lake

R Bertoni and C Callieri
CNR-Istituto Italiano di Idrobiologia, Pallanza, Italy

The effects of UVB radiation on the activity of heterotrophic (HPP) and autotrophic (APP) picoplankton (0.2-2 m) and of autotrophic assemblages >2 m has been measured and compared. Under natural UVB irradiance in a large, deep, oligotrophic subalpine lake (Lago Maggiore, 4555N) with mean dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations of 1 mg Cl-1, the microorganisms of the two size fractions were not significantly photoinhibited in their autotrophic and heterotrophic activities. The vertical attenuation coefficient (Kd) for irradiance at 305 nm ranged from 1.45 to 1.67 during spring and summer. The mixing layer extended to a greater depth than the layer affected by UVB radiation (z1% < zmix), thus enabling the microorganisms living there to photoadapt. As the assimilation numbers of APP and nanoplankton were higher at 2 m depth than near the surface, we suspected that the influence of longer wavelength (UVA, photosynthetically active radiation) could be stronger than UVB in affecting the photosynthetic efficiency of natural populations. The artificial increase in UVB irradiance had a higher detrimental effect on HPP due to their smaller size, less protection and indirect effects through autotrophic cell inhibition. Picocyanobacteria were percentually more affected by UVB than nanoplankton during April due to the presence of diatoms, which are more resistant than other algal groups to solar UVB irradiance. Furthermore, picocyanobacteria had lower assimilation numbers with respect to larger phytoplankton in the quartz tubes during stratification.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.