Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waggett, R.
Right arrow Articles by Costello, J.H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Waggett, R.
Right arrow Articles by Costello, J.H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Journal of Plankton Research Vol.21 no.11 pp.2037-2052, 1999
© Oxford University Press 1999

Capture mechanisms used by the lobate ctenophore, Mnemiopsis leidyi, preying on the copepod Acartia tonsa

R. Waggett1 and J.H. Costello2

Biology Department, Providence College, Providence, RI 02918-0001, USA

1 Present address: Marine Science Institute, University of Texas at Austin, Port Aransas, TX 78373-1267, USA

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed

Although the lobate ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi is an influential planktonic predator, the mechanisms enabling it to capture its characteristically wide range of prey have not been systematically examined. We recorded interactions between free-swimming M.leidyi and two stages (nauplii, adults) of the calanoid copepod Acartia tonsa in order to determine a mechanistic explanation of this feeding process. Prey encounter with Mnemiopsis involved two different processes. The first depended on fluid motions created by the nearly continuous beating of cilia lining the four auricles. These cilia created a low-velocity flow in which A.tonsa nauplii were entrained (94% of naupliar encounters) and transported past the oral lobes onto the tentillae (oral tentacles). The nauplii, although capable of rapid escape responses, generally appeared to be insensitive to the current in which they were carried. The second process relied upon the collision of swimming prey with the inner surfaces of the oral lobes and was not obviously influenced by the auricular feeding currents. Adult A.tonsa were rarely entrained in the auricular flow, but, instead, propelled themselves into contact with the oral lobes (97% of adult encounters). Both prey capture processes functioned simultaneously. The synergistic functioning of these processes probably explains the broad patterns of prey ingestion found by in situ studies of Mnemiopsis feeding.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
R. J. Waggett and L. J. Sullivan
Feeding efficiency of the larval ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi A. Agassiz (Ctenophora, Lobata)
J. Plankton Res., July 1, 2006; 28(7): 719 - 723.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
R. Rapoza, D. Novak, and J. H. Costello
Life-stage dependent, in situ dietary patterns of the lobate ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi Agassiz 1865
J. Plankton Res., September 1, 2005; 27(9): 951 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
G. A. Finenko, Z. A. Romanova, G. I. Abolmasova, B. E. Anninsky, L. S. Svetlichny, E. S. Hubareva, L. Bat, and A. E. Kideys
Population dynamics, ingestion, growth and reproduction rates of the invader Beroe ovata and its impact on plankton community in Sevastopol Bay, the Black Sea
J. Plankton Res., May 1, 2003; 25(5): 539 - 549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
J. H. Costello and H. W. Mianzan
Sampling field distributions of Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora, Lobata): planktonic or benthic methods?
J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2003; 25(4): 455 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.