Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spaink, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Roijackers, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Spaink, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Roijackers, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 20 | NUMBER 10 | PAGES 1997-2007 | 1998
© Oxford University Press

research-article

Plankton dynamics in a dead arm of the River Waal: a comparison with the main channel

Pepijn Abbink Spaink1, Thomas Ietswaart1 and Rudi Roijackers2

1National Institute for Public Health and Environment PO Box 1, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven 2Agricultural University, Department of Water Quality Management and Aquatic Ecology PO Box 8080, NL-6700 DD Wageningen, The Netherlands

To whom correspondence should be addressed

Received on April 21, 1997; accepted on June 11, 1998 It has been postulated that areas of reduced flow along rivers, either within the river channel or in the form of backwaters, exert a considerable influence on plankton dynamics in rivers. To test this hypothesis, a survey of plankton distribution in a dead arm along the River Waal, a branch of the River Rhine, was made. The euphotic fraction of the water column varied along the transect. Phytoplankton species composition changed from diatom-dominated populations in the river to dominance of green algae near the rear end of the dead arm. Green algae were dominated by Pandorina morum. The diatoms were dominated by typically riverine species, like Cyclotella menegh-iniana, Skeletonema potamos and Skeletonema subsalsum. The total zooplankton biovolume at the rear end was >100 times higher than in the river. In the river, rotifers and crustaceans co-dominated, whereas to the rear end the crustaceans became dominant. Diaphanosoma brachyurum was the most abundant zooplankter. The dynamic behaviour of both phytoplankton and zooplankton suggests the presence of an intense grazing network in the dead arm. There were also some indications of a rapid transfer of biomass to higher consumer levels, such as fish. The large difference in species composition between the dead arm and the river itself does not suggest a major influence by backwaters along the River Rhine. This may be due to its channelized nature. The situation can be different in rivers with a more natural morphology.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
L. Viroux
Seasonal and longitudinal aspects of microcrustacean (Cladocera, Copepoda) dynamics in a lowland river
J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2002; 24(4): 281 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.