Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindenschmidt, K.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Chorus, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lindenschmidt, K.-E.
Right arrow Articles by Chorus, I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 20 | NUMBER 10 | PAGES 1927-1951 | 1998
© Oxford University Press

research-article

The effect of water column mixing on phytoplankton succession, diversity and similarity

Karl-Erich Lindenschmidt and Ingrid Chorus1

FG Siedlungswasserwirtschaft, Technische Universitaät Berlin Straßie des 17 Juni 135 (Sekr.KF 7), 10623 Berlin 1Umweltbundesamt V2.2 Postfach 33 0013, 14191 Berlin, Germany

Received on July 14, 1997; accepted on May 14, 1998 The lake number was used to describe the mixing condition for three consecutive years (1992–1994) in Lake Tegel, Berlin, and compared to the successions of diatoms, dinoflagellates and cyanobacteria, the main phytoplankton groups in the lake, as well as to diversity and similarity indices. Using both diversity and similarity indices in juxtaposition provides an indication of the growth type of prevailing species (r- or K-strategists) and the degree of competition in the aqua-ecological system. A genera] pattern of these indices can be recognized as three phases: (i) high diversity—during spring, summer and autumn, interrupted by (ii) phases of low diversity during the late spring clear-water phase as the number of spring species plummeted, and (iii) during the late summer, climax populations of K-strategists. On a smaller time scale, similarity and diversity proved to react sensitively to disturbances at frequencies intermediate in relation to the generation times of the phytoplankton. This supports the ‘intermediate disturbance hypothesis’, as proposed for phytoplankton by Padisak et al. [(eds) Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis in Phytoplankton Ecology. Kluwer Academic, 1993]. Diversity may remain quite high even for extended periods during summer climax situations, in conjunction with a high degree of similarity, if deeper mixing of the epilimnion occurs at time intervals of 2–3 weeks, as during the summer of 1993. This enables the prevalence of ‘ruderal’ species, together with some motile K-strategists who actively seek optimal depths for photosynthesis. During such summer situations described by frequent occurrences of lower lake numbers, the epilimnion of Lake Tegel is mixed deeply enough to support ruderals, but not too vigorously to counteract competitive advantages of motile species. Thus, vertical niche separation enhances diversity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J PLANKTON RESHome page
G. Weithoff, N. Walz, and U. Gaedke
The intermediate disturbance hypothesis--species diversity or functional diversity?
J. Plankton Res., October 1, 2001; 23(10): 1147 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.