| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 7 | PAGES 877-890 | 1997
© Oxford University Press
research-article |
Autotrophic and heterotrophic nanoplankton in the diet of the estuarine copepods Eurytemora affinis and Acartia bifilosa

Laboratoire d'Oceanographie Bio1ogique Université Bordeaux I CNRS-URA 197, F-33120 Arcachon, France
Received on August 31, 1996; accepted on February 2, 1997
The ingestion of autotrophic and heterotrophic nanoplankton by two estuarine copepods, Eurytenora affinis and Acarith bifilosa, was measured in various environmental conditions using the incubation method and epifluorescence microscopy. Egg production of the species was also deter mined in order to estimate their carbon requirements. Assuming a gross efficiency of egg production of 0.3, nanoplanktonic carbon ingested always met the carbon requirements suggesting that, most of the time, other carbon sources could be unnecessaly. Nanoplankton ingestion by A.bifilosa (from 128 to 1693 cells ind.1 h1) was dominated by autotrophic forms (6097%) and was seriously affected by high (>100 mg l1 suspended particulate matter (SPM) concentrations. Nanoplankton ingestion by E.affinis (from 300 to 1049 cells ind1 h1) was relatively stable in comparison, but this latter species seemed to switch its grazing pressure from autotrophic to heterotrophic forms when SPM concentrations increased. Thus, two copepod species, living in the same estuary, presented two different feeding behaviours, probably to maximize energy input per unit of energy expenditure. Such differences could contribute to the spatial and seasonal segregation of these species which is usually observed.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Seuront Effect of salinity on the swimming behaviour of the estuarine calanoid copepod Eurytemora affinis J. Plankton Res., September 1, 2006; 28(9): 805 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Samuelsson, J. Berglund, and A. Andersson Factors structuring the heterotrophic flagellate and ciliate community along a brackish water primary production gradient J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2006; 28(4): 345 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kerner, S. Ertl, and A. Spitzy Trophic diversity within the planktonic food web of the Elbe Estuary determined on isolated individual species by 13C analysis J. Plankton Res., September 1, 2004; 26(9): 1039 - 1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Finlay and J. C Roff Radiotracer determination of the diet of calanoid copepod nauplii and copepodites in a temperate estuary ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2004; 61(4): 552 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Katajisto Development of Acartia bifilosa (Copepoda: Calanoida) eggs in the northern Baltic Sea with specialreference to dormancy J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2003; 25(4): 357 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Schmidt, M. Koski, J. Engstrom-ost, and A. Atkinson Development of Baltic Sea zooplankton in the presence of a toxic cyanobacterium: a mesocosm approach J. Plankton Res., October 1, 2002; 24(10): 979 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Engstrom, M. Koski, M. Viitasalo, M. Reinikainen, S. Repka, and K. Sivonen Feeding interactions of the copepods Eurytemora affinis and Acartia bifilosa with the cyanobacteria Nodularia sp. J. Plankton Res., July 1, 2000; 22(7): 1403 - 1409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Deceased 
