Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gasparini, S.
Right arrow Articles by Castelt, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gasparini, S.
Right arrow Articles by Castelt, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 19 | NUMBER 7 | PAGES 877-890 | 1997
© Oxford University Press


research-article

Autotrophic and heterotrophic nanoplankton in the diet of the estuarine copepods Eurytemora affinis and Acartia bifilosa

Stéphane Gasparini and Jacques Castelt{dagger}

Laboratoire d'Oceanographie Bio1ogique Université Bordeaux I CNRS-URA 197, F-33120 Arcachon, France

Received on August 31, 1996; accepted on February 2, 1997

The ingestion of autotrophic and heterotrophic nanoplankton by two estuarine copepods, Eurytenora affinis and Acarith bifilosa, was measured in various environmental conditions using the incubation method and epifluorescence microscopy. Egg production of the species was also deter mined in order to estimate their carbon requirements. Assuming a gross efficiency of egg production of 0.3, nanoplanktonic carbon ingested always met the carbon requirements suggesting that, most of the time, other carbon sources could be unnecessaly. Nanoplankton ingestion by A.bifilosa (from 128 to 1693 cells ind.–1 h–1) was dominated by autotrophic forms (60–97%) and was seriously affected by high (>100 mg l–1 suspended particulate matter (SPM) concentrations. Nanoplankton ingestion by E.affinis (from 300 to 1049 cells ind–1 h–1) was relatively stable in comparison, but this latter species seemed to switch its grazing pressure from autotrophic to heterotrophic forms when SPM concentrations increased. Thus, two copepod species, living in the same estuary, presented two different feeding behaviours, probably to maximize energy input per unit of energy expenditure. Such differences could contribute to the spatial and seasonal segregation of these species which is usually observed.

{dagger}Deceased


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
L. Seuront
Effect of salinity on the swimming behaviour of the estuarine calanoid copepod Eurytemora affinis
J. Plankton Res., September 1, 2006; 28(9): 805 - 813.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
K. Samuelsson, J. Berglund, and A. Andersson
Factors structuring the heterotrophic flagellate and ciliate community along a brackish water primary production gradient
J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2006; 28(4): 345 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
M. Kerner, S. Ertl, and A. Spitzy
Trophic diversity within the planktonic food web of the Elbe Estuary determined on isolated individual species by 13C analysis
J. Plankton Res., September 1, 2004; 26(9): 1039 - 1048.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ICES J. Mar. Sci.Home page
K. Finlay and J. C Roff
Radiotracer determination of the diet of calanoid copepod nauplii and copepodites in a temperate estuary
ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2004; 61(4): 552 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
T. Katajisto
Development of Acartia bifilosa (Copepoda: Calanoida) eggs in the northern Baltic Sea with specialreference to dormancy
J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2003; 25(4): 357 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
K. Schmidt, M. Koski, J. Engstrom-ost, and A. Atkinson
Development of Baltic Sea zooplankton in the presence of a toxic cyanobacterium: a mesocosm approach
J. Plankton Res., October 1, 2002; 24(10): 979 - 992.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
J. Engstrom, M. Koski, M. Viitasalo, M. Reinikainen, S. Repka, and K. Sivonen
Feeding interactions of the copepods Eurytemora affinis and Acartia bifilosa with the cyanobacteria Nodularia sp.
J. Plankton Res., July 1, 2000; 22(7): 1403 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.