Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Dam, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Dam, H. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 18 | NUMBER 5 | PAGES 855-861 | 1996
© Oxford University Press


other

Pigment ingestion and egg production rates of the calanoid copepod Temora longicornisr. implications for gut pigment loss and omnivorous feeding

William T. Peterson and Hans G. Dam1

NOAA/NMFS, Hatfield Marine Science Center 2030 Marine Science Drive, Newport, OR 97365 1Department of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut Groton, CT 06340-6097, USA

Received on December 29, 1994; accepted on December 11, 1995 We examined the relationship between egg production rate (E) and pigment ingestion rate (I, from gut content corrected for 33% loss) for adult female Temora longicornis in Long Island Sound on 47 occasions. Linear regression of E on I [both variables expressed in mass of nitrogen (N) female–1 day–1] was: EN = 0.0016 + 0.770 x IN. The slope, 0.77, is the apparent gross efficiency of egg production, equivalent to the gross growth efficiency (GGE) assuming that females partition all nitrogen for growth into egg production. Published work suggests that a GGE of 0.37 would be expected for herbivorous copepods. The discrepancy between the expected value of 0.37 and observed value of 0.77 could result from unquantified losses of gut pigment or because T.longicomis ingested a significant amount of nitrogen by feeding as a carnivore. We suggest that if T.longicomis females derive all of their nitrogen for growth by feeding on phytoplankton, and if no correction for pigment loss is employed, then the gut pigment method underestimates pigment ingestion by no more than a factor of two.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
D. Calliari, A. Britos, and D. Conde
Testing the relationship between primary production and Acartia tonsa grazing pressure in an estuarine lagoon
J. Plankton Res., September 1, 2009; 31(9): 1045 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
I. Huskin, R. Anadon, R. S. Woodd-Walker, and R. P. Harris
Basin-scale latitudinal patterns of copepod grazing in the Atlantic Ocean
J. Plankton Res., December 1, 2001; 23(12): 1361 - 1371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
I. Huskin, R. Anadon, G. Medina, R. N. Head, and R. P. Harris
Mesozooplankton Distribution and Copepod Grazing in the Subtropical Atlantic Near the Azores: Influence of Mesoscale Structures
J. Plankton Res., July 1, 2001; 23(7): 671 - 691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.