| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 18 | NUMBER 10 | PAGES 1767-1779 | 1996
© Oxford University Press
research-article |
On assessment of prey ingestion by copepods
Skidaway Institute of Oceanography 10 Ocean Science Circle, Savannah, GA 31411, USA
Received on September 1, 1995; accepted on April 12, 1996
The consumption of photosynthetic and heterotrophic cells by an abundant calanoid copepod species feeding on natural plankton communities was quantified with a state-of-the-art image-analysis system. Late copepodid stages of Eucalanus pileatus did not ingest bactena, small photosynthetic and heterotrophic nanoplankton, or the abundant Ceratium spp. in quantifiable amounts Although diatoms were by far the most abundant cells (in terms of POC 11), the copepods ingested a higher percentage of ciliates in relation to their abundance than of diatoms and small heterotrophic dinoflagellates in the first experiment, and ingested a higher percentage of dinoflagel lates and ciliates compared to diatoms in the second experiment Heterotrophic cells sufficiently large to be captured were repeatedly preferred by E.pileatus over autotrophs of similar or larger size. More over, among the cells which could be individually perceived by this calanoid, larger ones were not pre ferred over smaller cells, implying that some aspect of food quality can be as significant as prey size. These results support the notion (e.g. Kleppel, Mar. Ecol Prog. Ser., 99, s183195, 1993) that feeding by copepods will be underestimated if ingestion of heterotrophic food organisms is not quantified. While the proposed microscope-based method is comparatively slow (
1 h per sample), it is the only tech nique which provides detailed information on both the size and trophic composition of ingested prey.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Pepin and J. F. Dower Variability in the trophic position of larval fish in a coastal pelagic ecosystem based on stable isotope analysis J. Plankton Res., August 1, 2007; 29(8): 727 - 737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Schnetzer and D. A. Caron Copepod grazing impact on the trophic structure of the microbial assemblage of the San Pedro Channel, California J. Plankton Res., October 1, 2005; 27(10): 959 - 971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fonda Umani, V. Tirelli, A. Beran, and B. Guardiani Relationships between microzooplankton and mesozooplankton: competition versus predation on natural assemblages of the Gulf of Trieste (northern Adriatic Sea) J. Plankton Res., October 1, 2005; 27(10): 973 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Johansson, E. Gorokhova, and U. Larsson Annual variability in ciliate community structure, potential prey and predators in the open northern Baltic Sea proper J. Plankton Res., January 1, 2004; 26(1): 67 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Finlay and J. C Roff Radiotracer determination of the diet of calanoid copepod nauplii and copepodites in a temperate estuary ICES J. Mar. Sci., January 1, 2004; 61(4): 552 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Zeldis, M. R. James, J. Grieve, and L. Richards Omnivory by copepods in the New Zealand Subtropical Frontal Zone J. Plankton Res., January 1, 2002; 24(1): 9 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

