JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 17 | NUMBER 6 | PAGES 1325-1335 | 1995
© Oxford University Press
research-article |
The allometry of algal growth rates
McGill University 1205 Avenue Docteur Penfield, Montréal, Québec, H3A 1B1, Canada
Received on May 5, 1994; accepted on February 27, 1995 In principle, allometric relationships for algal growth can be applied to biomass size spectra to yield estimates of primary productivity. In practice, reported values of the scaling exponent of algal growth are variable, perhaps reflecting differences in the expression of cell size or phyletic differences or small sample size. The present study established the relationship between algal growth and size with a larger set of literature data than has been used previously, and assessed the effects of expression of cell size and of gross taxonomic differences on that relationship. I was able to collect a data set consisting of 127 observations of daily growth rate and cell size from three algal divisions (Chlorophyta, Chrysophyta, Pyrrophyta) and five classes (Bacillariophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Chrysophyceae, Dinophyceae and Prymnesiophyceae). Growth rate (µ, in divisions day–1) varies with cell carbon content (pg C cell–1) as µ = 3.45C–0.21. The size effect (as reflected by the exponent) is smaller if algal size is expressed as cell volume, reflecting changes in cell composition with size. The exponent is not affected by taxonomic affiliation, but growth rates of Pyrrophyta and Dinophyceae (a class within Pyrrophyta) were significantly lower than those of other divisions and classes. However, pyrrophytes have such a small size range in this data set that no meaningful growth-size relationship can be developed for that group alone.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  L. Ou, D. Wang, B. Huang, H. Hong, Y. Qi, and S. Lu Comparative study of phosphorus strategies of three typical harmful algae in Chinese coastal waters J. Plankton Res., September 1, 2008; 30(9): 1007 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. V. Finkel, J. Sebbo, S. Feist-Burkhardt, A. J. Irwin, M. E. Katz, O. M. E. Schofield, J. R. Young, and P. G. Falkowski A universal driver of macroevolutionary change in the size of marine phytoplankton over the Cenozoic PNAS, December 18, 2007; 104(51): 20416 - 20420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Irwin, Z. V. Finkel, O. M. E. Schofield, and P. G. Falkowski Scaling-up from nutrient physiology to the size-structure of phytoplankton communities J. Plankton Res., May 1, 2006; 28(5): 459 - 471. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Cermeno, E. Maranon, J. Rodriguez, and E. Fernandez Size dependence of coastal phytoplankton photosynthesis under vertical mixing conditions J. Plankton Res., May 1, 2005; 27(5): 473 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Sun and D. Liu Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton J. Plankton Res., November 1, 2003; 25(11): 1331 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
F. H. Chang, J. Zeldis, M. Gall, and J. Hall Seasonal and spatial variation of phytoplankton assemblages, biomass and cell size from spring to summer across the north-eastern New Zealand continental shelf J. Plankton Res., July 1, 2003; 25(7): 737 - 758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Baird Reply to 'In defence of the Cell Quota model of micro-algal growth' by M. R. Droop J. Plankton Res., January 1, 2003; 25(1): 109 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Alvarez-Cobelas and C. Rojo Ecological goal functions and plankton communities in lakes J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2000; 22(4): 729 - 748. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|