Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burd, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burd, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, R. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 17 | NUMBER 5 | PAGES 965-997 | 1995
© Oxford University Press


research-article

Distribution of zooplankton associated with the Endeavour Ridge Hydrothermal Plume

Brenda J. Burd and Richard E. Thomson

Institute of Ocean Sciences, PO Box 6000, Sidney, BC, V8L 4B2 Canada

Received on August 21, 1994; accepted on December 14, 1994 Enhanced zooplankton biomass was found in shallow (<900 m) and deep (>900 m) net samples collected over the Endeavour Ridge hydrothermal plume in 1991 and 1992. This enhanced biomass was manifest in considerably higher abundance values for most species in proximity to the vent field compared with abundance values from net samples collected 10–50 km off-axis. The species most enriched in abundance by the hydrothermal plume were those normally found in the mid-depth scattering layer at 400–900 m depth. These mid-depth animals were also the dominant fauna in the deep scattering layers that overlie the hydrothermal plume at depths of 1200–1900 m near the main vent field. The abundance and biomass dominants were species with pronounced ontogenetic migration patterns, and their associated predators. The abundance of many typically deep species was also enhanced over the main vent field. Faimal compositions of net samples were compared using a similarity measure and average linkage rule. Deep fauna in proximity to the vent field but not associated with scattering layers (Group 1), were similar to deep fauna 10–50 km off axis. The fauna of the deep scattering layer over the vent field (Group 2) was most similar to surface and mid- depth scattering layer fauna found within a 50km radius of the vent field. Statistical tests of linkages obtained using a bootstrap method indicate that the abundance and taxonomic composition of the two faunal groups were significantly distinct in 1992, but not in 1991. We conclude that there was considerable infiltration of shallow fauna into the deep scattering layers within 2–3 km of the main vent field, less extensive infiltration 10–15 km to the noilh and south of the vent field in 1991, and insignificant infiltration at stations 50km to the west of the vent field in 1992. A bootstrap analysis comparing the faunal composition of nets towed above 900 m depth showed that shallow fauna were not significantly distinct between the two sampling years or up to 50 km away from the vent field.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.