Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Johannsson, O. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, W. D.
Right arrow Articles by Johannsson, O. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 13 | NUMBER 2 | PAGES 363-372 | 1991
© Oxford University Press


research-article

A comparison of estimates of productivity and consumption by zooplankton for planktonic ciliates in Lake Ontario

William D. Taylor and Ora E. Johannsson1

1Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada Centre for Inland Waters PO Box 5050, Burlington, Ontario, Canada, L7R 4A6 Department of Biology, University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1

Received on December 19, 1989; accepted on October 22, 1990 A multiple regression equation predicting growth rate for ciliates from cell size and temperature was combined with measurements of biomass to estimate the productivity of ciliates in the epilimnion of Lake Ontario. This method predicts daily production to biomass values for ciliates of up to 5 day–1 and leads to the conclusion that ciliate production could equal half of the carbon fixation by phototrophs. Consumption of ciliates by metazoan zooplankton was estimated by incubating samples passed through 44 µm screens, and determining the increase in abundance of ciliates over 24 h. These rates are much lower, >1 day–1 and often near zero. Production estimates based on these latter rates would be ~3–4% of primary production Possible explanations for this discrepancy include both predation within the microzooplankton community and food limitation, as well as bottle effects However, the lower production estimates are still compatible with ciliates playing a major role as grazers in this ecosystem


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
M. Macek, K. Simek, and T. Bittl
Conspicuous Peak of Oligotrichous Ciliates Following Winter Stratification in a Bog Lake
J. Plankton Res., April 1, 2001; 23(4): 353 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PLANKTON RESHome page
A.-M. Hansen
Response of ciliates and Cryptomonas to the spring cohort of a cyclopoid copepod in a shallow hypereutrophic lake
J. Plankton Res., January 1, 2000; 22(1): 185 - 203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.