Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoeneck, L.J.
Right arrow Articles by Stoeckel, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schoeneck, L.J.
Right arrow Articles by Stoeckel, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 12 | NUMBER 1 | PAGES 29-40 | 1990
© Oxford University Press


research-article

Diel periodicity and selectivity in the feeding rate of the predatory copepod Mesocyclops edax

L.Jane Schoeneck, Craig E. Williamson and Mark E. Stoeckel

Lehigh University, Department of Biology Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA

Received on August 16, 1988; accepted on September 7, 1989 The diel periodicity and selectivity in the feeding behavior of the predatory cyclopoid copepod Mesocyclops edax was investigated at 3 h intervals over two 24 h sampling periods in nature. Gut content analyses revealed an increase in gut fullness at 11.30 and 20.30 in July, and at 20.30 in August. The increase in gut fullness at these times could not be explained by an increase in prey density, changes in predator-prey overlap or differences in prey vulnerability. We suggest that M.edax exhibits a true diel periodicity in the intensity of its predatory activities, although the alternative hypothesis of a diel periodicity in gut passage time cannot be ruled out. Vanderploeg and Scavia's E* selectivity index indicated a preference for rotifer and cladoceran prey over copepods.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.