Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McClatchie, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nordin, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McClatchie, S.
Right arrow Articles by Nordin, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

JOURNAL OF PLANKTON RESEARCH | VOLUME 11 | NUMBER 2 | PAGES 361-374 | 1989
© Oxford University Press

research-article

Aggregation of avian predators and zooplankton prey in Otago shelf waters, New Zealand

S. McClatchie, D. Hutchinson1 and K. Nordin1

Portobello Marine Laboratory PO Box 8, Portobello, Otago, New Zealand 1Department of Zoology, University of Otago PO Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand

Received on April 26, 1988; accepted on December 6, 1988 In Otago shelf waters surface swarms of krill (Nyctiphanes australis), hyperiid amphipods (Parathemisto spp.) and galatheid crab larvae (Munida gregaria) provide an abundant summer food source for planktivores. We tested the hypothesis that aggregation of avian planktivores depends upon the spatial distribution of their prey. Gulls (Larus scopulinus, L.bulleri, L.dominicanus), sooty shearwaters (Puffinus griseus) and white-fronted terns (Sterna striata) showed significantly aggregated distributions. The distribution of birds sitting on the sea surface was correlated with the abundance pattern of krill but was not correlated with the distribution of smaller hyperiid amphipods. The distribution of flying red-billed gulls (L.scopulinus), black-billed gulls (L.bulleri) and sooty shearwaters was correlated with the krill distribution but black-backed gulls (L.dominicanus) were not. Stomach contents of black-billed gulls were dominated by krill, in contrast to sooty shearwaters, which ate a higher proportion of Minida, and black-backed gulls, which contained Munida and fish. No amphipods were found in bird stomachs. There was no significant correlation between bird distributions and the hydrographic regime, water depth or distance offshore. The distribution of prey rather than hydrographic regime was a more important determinant of bird distributions at this spatial scale (2.6–12 km) and location.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.